2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13081528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earth Observation for Sustainable Infrastructure: A Review

Abstract: Infrastructure is a fundamental sector for sustainable development and Earth observation has great potentials for sustainable infrastructure development (SID). However, implementations of the timely, large–scale and multi–source Earth observation are still limited in satisfying the huge global requirements of SID. This study presents a systematical literature review to identify trends of Earth observation for sustainable infrastructure (EOSI), investigate the relationship between EOSI and Sustainable Developme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 205 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, the "financialization" of Internet enterprises and the "internetization" of traditional financial services have promoted the deep integration of financial technology and inclusive finance, enabling China's digital inclusive finance to achieve extraordinary development [1]. With the initial improvement of digital technology infrastructure in rural areas and the further increase of national policy support for the development of digital inclusive finance in rural areas, digital inclusive finance has gradually penetrated into the "three rural areas," making an important contribution to the country's poverty eradication efforts and the complete elimination of absolute poverty [2]. At present, China has started a new journey of relative poverty alleviation, and the relative poverty, mainly characterized by the income disparity between urban and rural residents, has become a major practical issue of great concern to the government and academia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the "financialization" of Internet enterprises and the "internetization" of traditional financial services have promoted the deep integration of financial technology and inclusive finance, enabling China's digital inclusive finance to achieve extraordinary development [1]. With the initial improvement of digital technology infrastructure in rural areas and the further increase of national policy support for the development of digital inclusive finance in rural areas, digital inclusive finance has gradually penetrated into the "three rural areas," making an important contribution to the country's poverty eradication efforts and the complete elimination of absolute poverty [2]. At present, China has started a new journey of relative poverty alleviation, and the relative poverty, mainly characterized by the income disparity between urban and rural residents, has become a major practical issue of great concern to the government and academia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple pathways exist for the application of infrastructure to sustainability goals, in particular through innovation and emerging technologies. According to Song and Wu (2021), examples of such technologies include 'cloud computing for earth big data applications, digital twin for sustainable and smart cities, and blockchain for sustainable infrastructure management' (p 11). A case of the digital twin concept in practice is Virtual Singapore, which is a 'threedimensional city model and collaborative data platform' to facilitate virtual activities like experimentation, test-bedding, urban planning, and research and development 3 .…”
Section: Circular Economy As a Framework For Sustainable Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing these data to produce indicators that provide local measurements of themes of interest to local stakeholders is a necessary, yet oftentimes missing, step to enable the supply of new data to meet the demand for locally relevant insights and responsive decision-making (Prakash et al 2020;Wellmann et al 2020). Additionally, these indicators can help urban policymakers and civil society assess differences within their cities; make comparisons with other cities; and measure themselves against national or global benchmarks, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), or against self-defined metrics (Kuffer et al 2018;Avtar et al 2019;Kavvada et al 2020;Wang et al 2020;Giuliani et al 2021;Song and Wu 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%