2013
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Early trophic feeding versus enteral fasting for very preterm or very low birth weight infants
Abstract: Early trophic feeding versus enteral fasting for very preterm or very low birth weight infants.
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
143
23
14
2
Citation Types
1
104
2
5
Year Published
Range
2000
20002026
2026Publication Types
Select...
149
17
6
5
Relationship
5
172
Authors
Journals
Cited by 176 publications
(112 citation statements)
References 51 publications
1
104
2
5
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In a retrospective study of VLBW infants, the authors showed in a binary logistic regression model that any formula feedings during days 1 to 14 increased the risk of NEC 3.5 times. Thus, the early-life exposure to FM, in a critical window of transition from intrauterine to extrauterine nutrition, rather than a specific daily volume or percentage of MM within the total enteral feedings, increases the risk of NEC in VLBW infants [13,28]. This is in accordance with our results where no differences were found in the first day of enteral feeding and volume increases between control and NEC infants.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In a retrospective study of VLBW infants, the authors showed in a binary logistic regression model that any formula feedings during days 1 to 14 increased the risk of NEC 3.5 times. Thus, the early-life exposure to FM, in a critical window of transition from intrauterine to extrauterine nutrition, rather than a specific daily volume or percentage of MM within the total enteral feedings, increases the risk of NEC in VLBW infants [13,28]. This is in accordance with our results where no differences were found in the first day of enteral feeding and volume increases between control and NEC infants.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…While early initiated (within 72 h), moderately early (72 h-7 days), or late advanced (>7 days) and MoV increment (20-< 30 mL/kg/day) strategies, EIMAMoV and EI-LAMoV, were the 2 most effective strategies to decrease the incidence of NEC or mortality, the early initiated, early advanced (<72 h), and small-volume advancement reg-imen (<20 mL/kg/day) EIEASV was the least effective. While our analysis revealed early initiated feeding strategies to be better than the later ones, Morgan et al [6] in their SR and pair-wise meta-analysis of early trophic feeds (introduced before 96 h of age and continued for at least until 1 week after birth) versus enteral fasting did not find any difference in the incidence of NEC or mortality. This could be explained by the inclusion of recent studies in our review.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Whilst our analysis revealed early initiated feeding strategies to be better than later ones, Morgan et al (2013) in their SR and pair-wise meta-analysis of early trophic feeds (introduced before 96 hours of age and continued for atleast until one week after birth) versus enteral fasting did not find any difference in the incidence of NEC or mortality. [6] This could be explained by the inclusion of recent studies in our review.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 56%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A meta-analysis study reported that early enteral feeding did not increase the incidence of NEC with a typical risk ratio of 1.07 (95% CI 0.67-1.70); risk difference 0.01 (-0.03-0.05). 23 In this study, late enteral feeding was positively correlated with the LOS in the hospital.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 52%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In a retrospective study of VLBW infants, the authors showed in a binary logistic regression model that any formula feedings during days 1 to 14 increased the risk of NEC 3.5 times. Thus, the early-life exposure to FM, in a critical window of transition from intrauterine to extrauterine nutrition, rather than a specific daily volume or percentage of MM within the total enteral feedings, increases the risk of NEC in VLBW infants [13,28]. This is in accordance with our results where no differences were found in the first day of enteral feeding and volume increases between control and NEC infants.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…While early initiated (within 72 h), moderately early (72 h-7 days), or late advanced (>7 days) and MoV increment (20-< 30 mL/kg/day) strategies, EIMAMoV and EI-LAMoV, were the 2 most effective strategies to decrease the incidence of NEC or mortality, the early initiated, early advanced (<72 h), and small-volume advancement reg-imen (<20 mL/kg/day) EIEASV was the least effective. While our analysis revealed early initiated feeding strategies to be better than the later ones, Morgan et al [6] in their SR and pair-wise meta-analysis of early trophic feeds (introduced before 96 h of age and continued for at least until 1 week after birth) versus enteral fasting did not find any difference in the incidence of NEC or mortality. This could be explained by the inclusion of recent studies in our review.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Whilst our analysis revealed early initiated feeding strategies to be better than later ones, Morgan et al (2013) in their SR and pair-wise meta-analysis of early trophic feeds (introduced before 96 hours of age and continued for atleast until one week after birth) versus enteral fasting did not find any difference in the incidence of NEC or mortality. [6] This could be explained by the inclusion of recent studies in our review.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 56%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A meta-analysis study reported that early enteral feeding did not increase the incidence of NEC with a typical risk ratio of 1.07 (95% CI 0.67-1.70); risk difference 0.01 (-0.03-0.05). 23 In this study, late enteral feeding was positively correlated with the LOS in the hospital.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 52%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In a retrospective study of VLBW infants, the authors showed in a binary logistic regression model that any formula feedings during days 1 to 14 increased the risk of NEC 3.5 times. Thus, the early-life exposure to FM, in a critical window of transition from intrauterine to extrauterine nutrition, rather than a specific daily volume or percentage of MM within the total enteral feedings, increases the risk of NEC in VLBW infants [13,28]. This is in accordance with our results where no differences were found in the first day of enteral feeding and volume increases between control and NEC infants.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…While early initiated (within 72 h), moderately early (72 h-7 days), or late advanced (>7 days) and MoV increment (20-< 30 mL/kg/day) strategies, EIMAMoV and EI-LAMoV, were the 2 most effective strategies to decrease the incidence of NEC or mortality, the early initiated, early advanced (<72 h), and small-volume advancement reg-imen (<20 mL/kg/day) EIEASV was the least effective. While our analysis revealed early initiated feeding strategies to be better than the later ones, Morgan et al [6] in their SR and pair-wise meta-analysis of early trophic feeds (introduced before 96 h of age and continued for at least until 1 week after birth) versus enteral fasting did not find any difference in the incidence of NEC or mortality. This could be explained by the inclusion of recent studies in our review.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Whilst our analysis revealed early initiated feeding strategies to be better than later ones, Morgan et al (2013) in their SR and pair-wise meta-analysis of early trophic feeds (introduced before 96 hours of age and continued for atleast until one week after birth) versus enteral fasting did not find any difference in the incidence of NEC or mortality. [6] This could be explained by the inclusion of recent studies in our review.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 56%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A meta-analysis study reported that early enteral feeding did not increase the incidence of NEC with a typical risk ratio of 1.07 (95% CI 0.67-1.70); risk difference 0.01 (-0.03-0.05). 23 In this study, late enteral feeding was positively correlated with the LOS in the hospital.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 52%