1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.1992.tb07235.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early settling the following spring: a long‐term benefit of mate desertion by male Great Reed Warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus

Abstract: ku. Osak(4 j j X . ltiptiri In a population of'the Great Reed Warbler Arroc~~pliirius arirrrilirirrc.c~irs in central Japan 3 3 cascs of m a t e desertion by males were recorded during eight breeding seasons. Thirty of these occurred at the e n d of the breeding season. The absence of t h e male parent during t h e nestling period affected neither the frequency of'nestling starvation nor the return of I'emales. Eight deserters were confirnied to have begun moulting prior to the fledging o f their young. Mal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the king penguin (Aptenodytes patagonicus), southern giant petrel (Macronectes giganteus) and spotted owl (Strix occidentalis), the effect was opposite: breeding affected future breeding probability but not survival [41,52,57]. Similarly, in the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus), there is a cost of paternal care on future reproduction (timing of settlement) but no detectable cost on survival [32]. This stresses the importance of studing both fecundity costs of reproduction and survival costs of reproduction.…”
Section: Tests Of Direct Costs Of Reproduction In Malesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the king penguin (Aptenodytes patagonicus), southern giant petrel (Macronectes giganteus) and spotted owl (Strix occidentalis), the effect was opposite: breeding affected future breeding probability but not survival [41,52,57]. Similarly, in the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus), there is a cost of paternal care on future reproduction (timing of settlement) but no detectable cost on survival [32]. This stresses the importance of studing both fecundity costs of reproduction and survival costs of reproduction.…”
Section: Tests Of Direct Costs Of Reproduction In Malesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we examined the breeding success of adults attempting to rear more than one brood within a nesting season, and the long-term costs of polygamy either to survivorship as a result of increased reproductive effort (Lessells 1984, Jonsson & Alerstam 1990 or through a delay in initiating nesting the following year through delays in other activities in the intervening period (e.g. moult, Ueda 1987, Urano 1992.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, late-season parental desertion could still be advantageous if it increases survival in some way, for example by eliminating temporal overlap with moult (Nolan 1978, Ezaki 1988, Hemborg 1999, Mumme 2018, by allowing birds in low body condition to prepare for migration (Kelly & Kennedy 1993) or by making earlier migration possible (Stutchbury et al 2011). Late-season desertion could also be selectively advantageous if it provides significant carry-over benefits in the subsequent breeding season, such as earlier arrival on the breeding grounds (Urano 1992, Osorno & Sz ekely 2004.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2011). Late‐season desertion could also be selectively advantageous if it provides significant carry‐over benefits in the subsequent breeding season, such as earlier arrival on the breeding grounds (Urano 1992, Osorno & Székely 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%