2016
DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-15-1051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With Different Ablation Technologies – Prospective Comparison of Radiofrequency vs. Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation –

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
39
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(27 reference statements)
5
39
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study showed that ERAFs were the sole significant factor for predicting AF recurrences after the blanking period, which was in agreement with the data post RF ablation . A prior study reported the greatest proportion of ERAFs in the first 2 weeks of the blanking period in a sample of patients fitted with an external loop recorder for the first 3 months after AF ablation using RF technology .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our study showed that ERAFs were the sole significant factor for predicting AF recurrences after the blanking period, which was in agreement with the data post RF ablation . A prior study reported the greatest proportion of ERAFs in the first 2 weeks of the blanking period in a sample of patients fitted with an external loop recorder for the first 3 months after AF ablation using RF technology .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, Kenigsberg et al reported that the intact areas of the posterior LA wall immediately after PV isolation with CB ablation were only 27% . Myocardial damage during the procedure is reported to be larger in CB ablation than in RF ablation, which was also observed in our study. The edematous change during the acute phase might be greater in CB ablation than in RF ablation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…1 LA injury during the ablation procedure may be more severe in cryoballoon (CB) ablation than in radiofrequency (RF) ablation. 2 However, the immediate difference in LV diastolic function due to acutely impaired LA compliance between the 2 ablation procedures, possibly resulting from the extent of the isolated area of the posterior LA wall during the acute phase, remains to be seen. We recently reported afterloadrelated index for LV diastolic function is significantly higher in elderly (age ≥ 75 years) hypertensive females than in elderly hypertensive males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a nonrandomized fashion, Miyazaki et al[9] prospectively examined 82 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF treated with PVI using either radiofrequency ablation vs cryoablation with the second generation cryoballoon. While the peak hs-CRP level was similar between ablation techniques, the level of hs-CRP 2 days post-ablation predicted development of ERAA in those treated with radiofrequency (HR = 1.7; 95%CI: 1.01-2.87; P = 0.048) but not cryoablation, suggesting that degree of inflammatory marker response may have a stronger predictive value for ERAA after radiofrequency compared with cryoablation.…”
Section: Frequency Of Eraamentioning
confidence: 99%