Early prognostication of neurological outcome by heart rate variability in adult patients with out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest

Abstract

Background Most deaths of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest result from withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) decisions based on poor neurological prognostication and the family’s intention. Thus, accurate prognostication is crucial to avoid premature WLST decisions. However, targeted temperature management (TTM) with sedation or neuromuscular blockade against shivering significantly affects early prognostication. In this study, we investigated whether heart rate variability (HRV) analysis could prognosticate poor neurological outcome in comatose patients undergoing hypothermic TTM. Methods Between January 2015 and December 2017, adult patients with out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest, successfully resuscitated in the emergency department and admitted to the intensive care unit of the Niigata University in Japan, were prospectively included. All patients had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale motor score of 1 and received hypothermic TTM (at 34 °C). Twenty HRV-related variables (deceleration capacity; 4 time-, 3 geometric-, and 7 frequency-domain; and 5 complexity variables) were computed based on RR intervals between 0:00 and 8:00 am within 24 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Based on Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 2 weeks after ROSC, patients were divided into good outcome (GOS 1–2) and poor outcome (GOS 3–5) groups. Results Seventy-six patients were recruited and allocated to the good (n = 22) or poor (n = 54) outcome groups. Of the 20 HRV-related variables, ln very-low frequency (ln VLF) power, detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) (α1), and multiscale entropy (MSE) index significantly differed between the groups (p = 0.001), with a statistically significant odds ratio (OR) by univariate logistic regression analysis (p = 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the 3 variables identified ln VLF power and DFA (α1) as significant predictors for poor outcome (OR = 0.436, p = 0.006 and OR = 0.709, p = 0.024, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ln VLF power and DFA (α1) in predicting poor outcome was 0.84 and 0.82, respectively. In addition, the minimum value of ln VLF power or DFA (α1) for the good outcome group predicted poor outcome with sensitivity = 61% and specificity = 100%. Conclusions The present data indicate that HRV analysis could be useful for prognostication for comatose patients during hypothermic TTM.

Influence of Obesity on Heart Rate Variability in Nurses with Age and Shift Type as Moderators

“…Individuals working rotating shifts are thus at greater risk of cardiac dysrhythmia, which can lead to sudden death [ 2 , 3 ]. HRV has even been found to be a predictor of postmyocardial infarction mortality [ 4 ].…”

Cardio-audio synchronization elicits neural and cardiac surprise responses in human wakefulness and sleep

“…Detecting the heart rate deceleration with a measure as easily obtained and artifact-free as the ECG signal could offer a simple and reproducible biomarker of the preservation of sensory regularity processing in health and disease. In line with this proposal, recent work posits that the analysis of heart rate fluctuations may be informative of the degree of preservation of conscious sensory processing in healthy populations and disorders of consciousness patients [50–53]. A further investigation into the origins of the cardiac omission response through the measure of pupil dilation, respiration or changes in skin conductance will help identify to what extent this response is a consequence of autonomic nervous system activity.…”

Cardiac function after cardiac arrest: what do we know?

“…39,40 The crosstalk between heart rate and autonomic function (e.g. the heart rate variability 41 and the haemodynamic response during different phases of hypothermia 42 ) is a topic of growing interest. No prospective trial has evaluated potential strategies to reduce heart rate during post-resuscitation care, so it is unclear if lower heart rate represents a prognostic marker or could be a future treatment target.…”