1993
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)93061-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early prediction of individual outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Short-latency SEPs lack the capacity to identify patients whose outcomes will be favorable after cardiac arrest. Long-latency SEPs have been found useful even for this purpose by Austrian investigators (22). Madl et al have previously shown that in normothermic cardiac arrest patients, a latency Ͼ130 msec to cortical evoked potential N70 peak or absent N70 peaks predict poor outcome with a specificity of 97% and sensitivity of 94%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short-latency SEPs lack the capacity to identify patients whose outcomes will be favorable after cardiac arrest. Long-latency SEPs have been found useful even for this purpose by Austrian investigators (22). Madl et al have previously shown that in normothermic cardiac arrest patients, a latency Ͼ130 msec to cortical evoked potential N70 peak or absent N70 peaks predict poor outcome with a specificity of 97% and sensitivity of 94%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the past few years, various attempts have been made to assess brain damage in comatose patients soon after cardiac arrest. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Most of them, however, exhibit major limitations. A recent meta-analysis of the clinical and electrophysiological predictors of poor outcome in anoxic-ischemic coma based on data from Ͼ4500 patients suggested that the absence of N20 components of somatosensory evoked potentials in comatose patients with anoxic brain injury and the absence of pain or pupillary responses at 72 hours after cardiac arrest confirm that continuation of life support is futile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various attempts, including neurological evaluation, cranial CT, electroencephalogram, somatosensory evoked potentials, and measurement of cerebral oxygen consumption, have been made to assess brain damage in comatose patients soon after cardiac arrest. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Early neurological and electrophysiological evaluations, however, do not predict cerebral outcome. 11 A serum marker that reflects the severity of brain damage as accurately as biochemical markers do in myocardial injury, 12 however, would improve early evaluation and quantification of post-cardiac arrest brain damage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some authors have successfully shown that the early SSEPs are highly predictive for outcome after cerebral trauma, 36 it appears from this analysis, that the outcome following head injury cannot be accurately predicted from the initial SSEP responses. This is substantiated by others who have found that if the cortical responses are near normal in the first 24 hours after trauma, then SSEPs should be repeated later in the monitoring period before an accurate prediction can be given.…”
Section: Sseps and Outcomementioning
confidence: 90%