2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early prediction of Biochemical Methane Potential through statistical and kinetic modelling of initial gas production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4b. The methane production rate can be divided into typical three periods of Michaelis-Menten model (Stromberg et al, 2015), including zero order reaction at the 1st period and first order reaction in the 2nd period and lowspeed reaction in the 3rd period. The methane production rate achieved in the 1st period was the highest at 16.23 ± 3.51 NmlÁh…”
Section: Dynamic Threshold Determination Of the Biogas-ph Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4b. The methane production rate can be divided into typical three periods of Michaelis-Menten model (Stromberg et al, 2015), including zero order reaction at the 1st period and first order reaction in the 2nd period and lowspeed reaction in the 3rd period. The methane production rate achieved in the 1st period was the highest at 16.23 ± 3.51 NmlÁh…”
Section: Dynamic Threshold Determination Of the Biogas-ph Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For potato processing starch wastewater which was of low alkalinity and pH, pH was a sensitive alert of overload which leads to VFA accumulation and methanogenesis inhibition (Colin et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2014). On the contrary, underload of methanogenesis can be monitored by biogas production rate (Liu et al, 2014;Stromberg et al, 2015). In a summary, the combined monitoring of biogas flow rate in the gas phase and pH in the liquid phase may provide sensitive thresholds based digestion dynamic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is different from another SMA as kinetics coefficient k in the first-order kinetics or the Monod model of methane productions (Strömberg et al 2015), because the SMA as maximum specific rate has more links with the performance of the AnMBR under the biogas-pH control strategy (Yu et al 2016). The methane production speed was used as the slope for accumulated methane production.…”
Section: Methanogenesis Performance Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TE supplementation concentrations were calculated on TE ion concentration in solution which was regarded as approximately bioavailable form (Vintiloiu et al 2013 To make results more comparable in these test groups, all effects of TEs on methanogenesis were calculated as percentage (Strömberg et al 2015); such as, effect of TE supplementation on methane production was calculated as Eq. (3):…”
Section: Experiments Of Te Supplementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si bien no se propone establecer una duración fija para el ensayo, debido a que este parámetro depende del tipo de sustrato empleado, se recomienda considerar algunos indicadores reportados como el suspender el ensayo cuando la producción diaria de biogás es equivalente al 1% del volumen total producido hasta ese momento [6] o cuando la presión al interior del reactor no varía en más de 5 HPa, en caso de emplear el método manométrico. Recientemente, Strömberg et al [48] recomiendan acompañar el ensayo de modelos cinéticos que permiten predecir el valor del PBM final realizando un montaje de aproximadamente de 6 días. Los métodos de medición del CH 4 son otro de los factores que presentan una alta variabilidad en los ensayos, pues existen diferentes alternativas cuya selección depende de cada contexto; sin embargo, son pocos los estudios en los que se valide que no existen diferencias significativas entre el método empleado y que los resultados obtenidos sean comparables.…”
Section: Manométricounclassified