2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early milling chatter identification by improved empirical mode decomposition and multi-indicator synthetic evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The commonly-used complexity measure of signals is fractal analysis. Ji et al (2018) applied a single-fractal analysis for chatter detection, assuming scale invariance of signals independent on time. However, temporal variations in scale invariant structure often appear (Ihlen, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly-used complexity measure of signals is fractal analysis. Ji et al (2018) applied a single-fractal analysis for chatter detection, assuming scale invariance of signals independent on time. However, temporal variations in scale invariant structure often appear (Ihlen, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several papers, these features are ranked and are utilized as the input for the machine learning classifiers. Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm is the most common classifier used for chatter classification [10,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Other less common classifiers include quadratic discrimination analysis [29], Hidden Markov Model (HMM) [30], generalized HMM [31], and logistic regression [32] (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to WPT, EMD and EEMD are also often utilized to featurize cutting signals. Ji et al [23] proposed EMD to both eliminate noise from milling vibration signals and to extract features from informative Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMF). Chen et al [24] used top-ranked features extracted from the IMFs obtained from EEMD for machining state detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard approach for chatter recognition from cutting signals has mostly focused on extracting features by decomposing the time series and combining them with supervised learning algorithms-most commonly Support Vector Machine (SVM). The two most widely used decompositions are Wavelet Packet Transform (WPT) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) [14][15][16][17][18]. Both WPT and EEMD require manually preprocessing the signal to identify the most informative parts of the signal which carry chatter signatures, which is characterized by the part of the decomposition whose spectrum contain the chatter frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%