2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.palwor.2015.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early divergence dates of demosponges based on mitogenomics and evaluated fossil calibrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the origin time of the FBD process should be greater than the maximum value of the root age with a log-normal distribution [25], we obtained different divergence times for Heteroscleromorpha/Keratosa in both analyses with the root age affecting the divergence time (see Table 1, Figure 1, node R). Previous ages estimated for crown-group Demospongiae, using different software, clock-model settings, and taxon sets, varied between 657-872 Ma [30,47,50,60], which is in the range of both of our analyses (see Table 1, Figure 1 and Suppl. Figure 4, node R).…”
Section: Implications For Divergence Time Estimates For Heterosclerommentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the origin time of the FBD process should be greater than the maximum value of the root age with a log-normal distribution [25], we obtained different divergence times for Heteroscleromorpha/Keratosa in both analyses with the root age affecting the divergence time (see Table 1, Figure 1, node R). Previous ages estimated for crown-group Demospongiae, using different software, clock-model settings, and taxon sets, varied between 657-872 Ma [30,47,50,60], which is in the range of both of our analyses (see Table 1, Figure 1 and Suppl. Figure 4, node R).…”
Section: Implications For Divergence Time Estimates For Heterosclerommentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The fossilized birth-death model [25,45] as implemented in BEAST v.2.4.3 [46] was used with the following settings for both analyses: An uncorrelated relaxed molecular clock model was chosen using default settings. No partitioning was applied on the data matrix as it had no influence on the divergence time estimation in [47] (see Table 4 and Figure 3 in [47]). For the molecular sequence data, a Gamma Site model with the JTT amino acid substitution model [48] was specified.…”
Section: Fbd Model Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent molecular phylogenetic studies support the common sense view that sponges (Porifera) are the sister group to all other animals [63,64]. Relaxed molecular clocks put the origin of crown-group demosponges 872-657 Ma (across studies) [65] consistent with biomarkers ∼660-640 Ma [58][59][60], but put silicification and spicule production later at 648-616 Ma [66]. Hence, the gap to the first widely accepted fossil sponges in the early Cambrian ∼535 Ma [67][68][69] could be partly due to poor preservation potential.…”
Section: Sessile Animals and Benthic Matsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In addition to resolving phylogenetic relationships among major lineages (orders) of heteroscromorphs, we provide molecular clock estimates for the divergences among them. While several molecular clock studies using demosponge mt-genome data have been recently conducted (Ma and Yang, 2016;Schuster et al, 2018b) they used much smaller datasets of mitogenomic sequences. Paradoxically, Schuster et al (2018) study was also based on a clearly erroneous phylogenetic tree of demosponge relationships with marine haplosclerids placed deep within the G4 clade (compare to Lavrov et al, 2008;Simion et al, 2017), which made most of their time estimates a priori misleading.…”
Section: Timing Molecular Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mtDNA sequences are well suited for phylogenetic analysis in Demospongiae as they contain a large amount of data, have a relatively low rate of nucleotide substitutions, and are homogeneous in nucleotide composition (Lavrov and Lang, 2005a;Lavrov et al, 2008;Ma and Yang, 2016;Schuster et al, 2017). Furthermore, in addition to sequence data, mitochondrial gene arrangements can be used to support or refute phylogenetic relationships (Boore and Brown, 1998;Lavrov and Lang, 2005a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%