2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early displacement of two part proximal humerus fractures treated with intramedullary proximal humeral nail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…37 The screw-in-screw configuration contributed to prevent varus collapse and it provided better stability and the additional calcar screw, a positive effect when regarding to the failure load reached. 33,38 Due to the application of screw-in-screw and calcar screw, the mean decrease of NSA was 1.9°in our nail group, which was less than Nolan et al 18 with Polaris nail (8°) and Rotman et al 30 with MultiLoc nail (16.5°).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…37 The screw-in-screw configuration contributed to prevent varus collapse and it provided better stability and the additional calcar screw, a positive effect when regarding to the failure load reached. 33,38 Due to the application of screw-in-screw and calcar screw, the mean decrease of NSA was 1.9°in our nail group, which was less than Nolan et al 18 with Polaris nail (8°) and Rotman et al 30 with MultiLoc nail (16.5°).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Our study showed comparable intraoperative NSA, but much higher loss of NSA in the Plate Group. On the contrary, Rotman et al 30 reported severe loss of NSA in patients treated with MultiLoc, and no ascending calcar screw was seen in their pictures to support the medial column and increase the axial stability which was indispensable in fracture reconstruction and avoiding secondary displacement. 31 - 33 Biomechanical evaluation showed that two screws and a calcar screw were superior in most aspects to increase the stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, it may damage the tissues and blood vessels of patients to different degrees [ 10 , 11 ]. While intramedullary nailing (IMN) is a less-invasive surgical procedure that has the advantages of reducing soft tissue damage, protecting the blood supply to the humerus, and shortening the operation time (OT) [ 12 , 13 ]. In this procedure, the intramedullary nail is inserted into the medullary cavity directly below the cartilage, and then, the proximal and distal locking screws are inserted through the auxiliary system [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the intramedullary nail has become a promising alternative, as well. It is widely used for fixation of the proximal humeral fractures, with the obviously advantages of percutaneous insertion, decreased soft tissue disruption, and less operative time, in both young or elderly patients 17,18 . Its clinical outcomes and biomechanical strength have been manifested effective 3–5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%