2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Damage Detection Based on Pattern Recognition and Data Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many applications in real life by using advanced validation algorithms such as clustering of social media data [22]- [24], bio-information [25], and damage detection [26] etc. However, most of the algorithms need to scale the original dataset with the normalization algorithm and then extract the major features by principal component analysis (PCA) before clustering.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many applications in real life by using advanced validation algorithms such as clustering of social media data [22]- [24], bio-information [25], and damage detection [26] etc. However, most of the algorithms need to scale the original dataset with the normalization algorithm and then extract the major features by principal component analysis (PCA) before clustering.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, many authors suggested performing PCA on the raw data, but the vast majority of them point out to a supervised empirical framework. Santos et al also proposed a PCA‐based normalization strategy but using the broken‐stick rule for choosing the most appropriate number of principal components related to global effects, such as those caused by environmental and operational actions. This strategy relies on the premise that the higher eigenvalues of PCA are related to environmental and operational effects.…”
Section: Feature Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the works addressing clustering methods, which are very well‐suited for unsupervised methods, report a supervised strategy for predefining cluster partitions to describe one or more known structural behaviors and, subsequently, compare them with new ones . However, some recently published works propose a time‐window procedure to extract sensitive features based on a fully unsupervised approach that uses clustering methods to perform feature classification. Such a methodology allows (a) detecting structural novelties without the necessity of any previous knowledge and (b) performing real‐time identification relying on the detection of novelties upon each newly acquired data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment observed that symbolic objects based on the interquartile intervals attain damage-sensitive information that can be utilized in classification algorithms as shown in the study by Alves et al (2015a). In the case of the study by Santos et al (2017), the dynamic cloud clustering algorithm was utilized, which is an adaptation of the popular k-means approach that converges to a solution quickly. This fast solution can cause issues however, as dynamic cloud clustering can converge to local minima.…”
Section: Non-modal-based Approaches To Damage Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disadvantage of the IDDM is that its assumption that for an undamaged state, all sources of vibration will equally cause all locations to produce the same variation in interpolation error will not be suitable to all bridge applications. Santos et al (2017) implemented a novel methodology to detect structural damage without the use of modal parameters. They proposed a data-driven technique that possesses real-time capabilities.…”
Section: Non-modal-based Approaches To Damage Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%