1988
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Early Alzheimer's Disease
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
52
2
1
1
Citation Types
0
6
0
0
Year Published
Range
1988
19882017
2017Publication Types
Select...
49
5
2
Relationship
6
50
Authors
Journals
Cited by 56 publications
(6 citation statements)
References 33 publications
0
6
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Revised Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment May Compromise the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease Dementia
Arch Neurol
Self Cite
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…63 The use of informant report to capture the intraindividual cognitive and functional decline that is the hallmark of symptomatic AD both minimizes this heterogeneity and enables the accurate identification of the subset of MCI that is caused by AD. 23,64–67 The clinical diagnosis of symptomatic AD with this method, even in individuals who meet MCI criteria, is supported by autopsy confirmation of AD neuropathology at rates (92%) comparable to those found for AD dementia. 68 …”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 78%
Revised Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment May Compromise the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease Dementia
Arch Neurol
Self Cite
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…63 The use of informant report to capture the intraindividual cognitive and functional decline that is the hallmark of symptomatic AD both minimizes this heterogeneity and enables the accurate identification of the subset of MCI that is caused by AD. 23,64–67 The clinical diagnosis of symptomatic AD with this method, even in individuals who meet MCI criteria, is supported by autopsy confirmation of AD neuropathology at rates (92%) comparable to those found for AD dementia. 68 …”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 78%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Participants with a CDR global score of 0.5 often have AD pathology at autopsy regardless of subsequent CDR global scores of 0 [22]. Back transitions (e.g., a diagnosis of MCI followed by subsequent diagnosis of intact cognition) may be explained by many factors including inter-clinician differences in application of diagnostic criteria, within-patient variability due to medical illness, polypharmacy, psychosocial factors, and/or resistance to cognitive decline due to cognitive reserve [7,23].…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The remaining 216 older adults were recruited from the Washington University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) and were screened for depression, untreated hypertension, reversible dementias, and other disorders associated with cognitive impairment. Presence and severity of dementia was assessed using the Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale (Morris, 1993; Morris & Fulling, 1988). CDR scale values and their matching dementia status are: 0 = no dementia, .5 = very mild dementia, 1 = mild dementia, 2 = moderate dementia, and 3 = severe dementia.…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Revised Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment May Compromise the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease Dementia
Arch Neurol
Self Cite
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…63 The use of informant report to capture the intraindividual cognitive and functional decline that is the hallmark of symptomatic AD both minimizes this heterogeneity and enables the accurate identification of the subset of MCI that is caused by AD. 23,64–67 The clinical diagnosis of symptomatic AD with this method, even in individuals who meet MCI criteria, is supported by autopsy confirmation of AD neuropathology at rates (92%) comparable to those found for AD dementia. 68 …”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 78%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Participants with a CDR global score of 0.5 often have AD pathology at autopsy regardless of subsequent CDR global scores of 0 [22]. Back transitions (e.g., a diagnosis of MCI followed by subsequent diagnosis of intact cognition) may be explained by many factors including inter-clinician differences in application of diagnostic criteria, within-patient variability due to medical illness, polypharmacy, psychosocial factors, and/or resistance to cognitive decline due to cognitive reserve [7,23].…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The remaining 216 older adults were recruited from the Washington University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) and were screened for depression, untreated hypertension, reversible dementias, and other disorders associated with cognitive impairment. Presence and severity of dementia was assessed using the Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale (Morris, 1993; Morris & Fulling, 1988). CDR scale values and their matching dementia status are: 0 = no dementia, .5 = very mild dementia, 1 = mild dementia, 2 = moderate dementia, and 3 = severe dementia.…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Revised Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment May Compromise the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease Dementia
Arch Neurol
Self Cite
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…63 The use of informant report to capture the intraindividual cognitive and functional decline that is the hallmark of symptomatic AD both minimizes this heterogeneity and enables the accurate identification of the subset of MCI that is caused by AD. 23,64–67 The clinical diagnosis of symptomatic AD with this method, even in individuals who meet MCI criteria, is supported by autopsy confirmation of AD neuropathology at rates (92%) comparable to those found for AD dementia. 68 …”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 78%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Participants with a CDR global score of 0.5 often have AD pathology at autopsy regardless of subsequent CDR global scores of 0 [22]. Back transitions (e.g., a diagnosis of MCI followed by subsequent diagnosis of intact cognition) may be explained by many factors including inter-clinician differences in application of diagnostic criteria, within-patient variability due to medical illness, polypharmacy, psychosocial factors, and/or resistance to cognitive decline due to cognitive reserve [7,23].…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The remaining 216 older adults were recruited from the Washington University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) and were screened for depression, untreated hypertension, reversible dementias, and other disorders associated with cognitive impairment. Presence and severity of dementia was assessed using the Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale (Morris, 1993; Morris & Fulling, 1988). CDR scale values and their matching dementia status are: 0 = no dementia, .5 = very mild dementia, 1 = mild dementia, 2 = moderate dementia, and 3 = severe dementia.…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 99%