1996
DOI: 10.1021/ma951455p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Scaling of DNA Diffusion Coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

36
293
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
36
293
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the theoretical value of 0.588 for the Flory exponent ν we find an exponent of α = 2ν = 1.18 for this model. If we take the experimentally obtained value for ν of 0.61 [9], we find α = 1.22 -in excellent agreement with our experiments, where we find power law scaling with an exponent of 1.26 ± 0.07.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking the theoretical value of 0.588 for the Flory exponent ν we find an exponent of α = 2ν = 1.18 for this model. If we take the experimentally obtained value for ν of 0.61 [9], we find α = 1.22 -in excellent agreement with our experiments, where we find power law scaling with an exponent of 1.26 ± 0.07.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Assuming Zimm dynamics (and thus that the solvent inside the coil moves with the polymer), the coil experiences a Stokes drag force of 6πηRv = 6πηR g dR g /dt, which for typical parameters yields a drag force of about 24 pN. This assumption is justified by experiments by Smith et al [9], who found clear evidence for Zimm dynamics for DNA longer than 4.3 kbp. Clearly, in this case the hydrodynamic friction on the part of the polymer outside the pore is the dominant force counteracting the driving force.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Within the range of lengths studied, D L ÿ2=3 and r L 2 , and thus the results do not follow the predictions of either the Rouse or Zimm model [1]. At the same time, our data are in a very good agreement with experimental results obtained by other techniques not related to FCS [5][6][7][8] and closely follow the predictions of the semiflexible polymer theory [4]. Therefore, our results clearly demonstrate that in the range of the lengths studied, dsDNA behaves as a semiflexible polymer with strong hydrodynamic interactions [29].…”
Section: -2supporting
confidence: 44%
“…The dynamics of dsDNA in solution has been a subject of a number of experimental investigations carried out by various techniques, including DLS [5], single-molecule fluorescence microscopy [6], electrophoresis [7], and TEB [8]. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) [9], a single-molecule technique that can provide more detailed information on the macromolecular dynamics than the classical ensemble-based methods, has been recently applied to investigation of DNA in solution [10 -12], which has lead to a controversy whether dsDNA dynamics in dilute solution is controlled by hydrodynamic interactions [10,12] or not [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical microfluidic flows are several orders of magnitude slower with Re ≪ 1, and the flow residence time in the microchannel (for performing bio-chemical analysis or other experiments) ranges from a few seconds to a few minutes. In contrast, the time required for the chain molecule concentration profile to fully develop scales as For lambda phase DNA (λ-DNA) in water and D ≈ 0.43µm 2 /s [36], the molecule diffuses a distance of O(10) µm in O(10 2 ) s. In order for the chain concentration profile to fully develop, the chain molecules need to diffuse for a much longer time than the typical residence time. To resolve this problem, we propose the use of oscillatory flow in microfluidic devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%