2015
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2014.2352859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Properties of Magnetic Barkhausen Noise in a Soft Microalloyed Steel

Abstract: This paper investigates dynamical behavior of magnetic Barkhausen noise (BN). The measurements were performed for a soft mild steel at controllable magnetizing conditions: 1) the fixed sinusoidal/triangular waveforms of the magnetic induction or 2) the surface magnetic field. Two vertically mounted Hall sensors were used for direct determination of the sample magnetic field. The BN was detected locally by a surface-mounted coil. A typical two-peak shape of the BN envelope was found to reduce to a usual single-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the additional noise ∆T , it receives contributions from, e.g., nonthermalized magnetic impurities, vibrations of the multilayer or magnet, and Barkhausen noise due to the relaxation of domain walls. However, these effects fall off rapidly above ∼ kHz frequencies, and we expect they are subdominant at the GHz to THz frequencies and long integration times relevant in this work [152][153][154][155][156][157]. Thus, for this initial study we neglect ∆T .…”
Section: Experimental Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As for the additional noise ∆T , it receives contributions from, e.g., nonthermalized magnetic impurities, vibrations of the multilayer or magnet, and Barkhausen noise due to the relaxation of domain walls. However, these effects fall off rapidly above ∼ kHz frequencies, and we expect they are subdominant at the GHz to THz frequencies and long integration times relevant in this work [152][153][154][155][156][157]. Thus, for this initial study we neglect ∆T .…”
Section: Experimental Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 94%