2011
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.05934-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Nucleosome-Depleted Regions at Androgen Receptor Enhancers in the Absence of Ligand in Prostate Cancer Cells

Abstract: Nucleosome positioning at transcription start sites is known to regulate gene expression by altering DNA accessibility to transcription factors; however, its role at enhancers is poorly understood. We investigated nucleosome positioning at the androgen receptor (AR) enhancers of TMPRSS2, KLK2, and KLK3/PSA in prostate cancer cells. Surprisingly, a population of enhancer modules in androgen-deprived cultures showed nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs) in all three loci. Under androgen-deprived conditions, NDRs at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
57
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
8
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Enhancers that bind AR exhibit nucleosomedepleted regions already in the absence of androgen (29). Together, these findings raise the question as to the role of the ligand in instructing the AR to bind to appropriate chromatin loci.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhancers that bind AR exhibit nucleosomedepleted regions already in the absence of androgen (29). Together, these findings raise the question as to the role of the ligand in instructing the AR to bind to appropriate chromatin loci.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAIRE-seq relies on enhanced sensitivity to DNA breakage of nucleosome-depleted regions (Giresi et al 2007; Nagy and Price 2009). Rather than using a nuclease, methyltransferase-based footprinting, with the CpG methyltransferase M.SssI (Gal-Yam et al 2006;Lin et al 2007;Bouazoune et al 2009;Kelly et al 2010) or GpC methyltransferase M.CviPI Wolff et al 2010;Andreu-Vieyra et al 2011;Taberlay et al 2011;You et al 2011), uses the placement of a biochemical mark (i.e., methylation) on DNA to assess nucleosome occupancy. Since GpC dinucleotides are not endogenously methylated, NOMe-seq provides both nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation within the same individual DNA strand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclei from IMR90 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press on May 12, 2018 -Published by genome.cshlp.org Downloaded from cells (ATCC) were isolated as previously described . Previous publications using locus-specific NOMe-seq have used the minimal amount of M.CviPI that resulted in optimal footprinting of the specific region of interest: 100 units (Wolff et al 2010), 200 units You et al 2011), or 200 + 100 units (Andreu-Vieyra et al 2011). Since whole-genome NOMe-seq required accurate footprinting of a variety of genomic regions, we performed a dose response curve ( Fig.…”
Section: Nucleosome Footprintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active tissue-specific enhancers are gener- ally devoid of CpG methylation and may also show lower nucleosome occupancy (49 -51). To determine the DNA methylation status and nucleosome occupancy of DME1 and DME2 in FSHD myocytes, we performed NOMe-seq, a recently pioneered technique that has been instrumental in assessing specific chromatin states both for single loci and across the genome (39,(50)(51)(52)(53). Taking advantage of the fact that mammalian cells lack GpC methylation, intact nuclei are incubated with the GpC methyltransferase M.CviPI, which methylates GpC dinucleotides not associated with nucleosomes or tightly bound transcription factors while leaving nucleosomal or transcription factor-occupied sites unmethylated.…”
Section: Identification Of Dux4 Myogenic Enhancer 1 (Dme1) and Dme2mentioning
confidence: 99%