2009
DOI: 10.1080/00207540701636355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic models of closed-loop supply chain and robust H control strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a follow-up paper, Zhou and Disney (2006) use control theory and simulation to investigate the impact of lead time and return rate on inventory variance and the bullwhip phenomenon. Huang et al (2009b) develop dynamic closed-loop supply chain models by considering the uncertainty due to time-delay in remanufacturing and returns, system cost parameters and customer demand's disturbances.…”
Section: Effect Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a follow-up paper, Zhou and Disney (2006) use control theory and simulation to investigate the impact of lead time and return rate on inventory variance and the bullwhip phenomenon. Huang et al (2009b) develop dynamic closed-loop supply chain models by considering the uncertainty due to time-delay in remanufacturing and returns, system cost parameters and customer demand's disturbances.…”
Section: Effect Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang, Wang, and Li (2009) analysed the equilibrium state of the CLSC using the theory of variation inequalities. Huang, Yan, and Qiu (2009) discussed the robust operations in a class of dynamic CLSC models using control theories, and practical experiments in the Chinese steel industry are implemented. Paksoy, Bektas, and Ozceyln (2011) formulated a linear programming model to balance the equilibrium between various costs.…”
Section: Clsc Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paksoy et al (2011) suggested a mathematical model in the form of a linear programming formulation is used to model the trade-offs between various costs including emissions and transporting commodities. Huang et al (2009) considered three uncertainties in their dynamic CLSC models: (i) time-delay in re-manufacturing and returns, (ii) system cost parameters in product return, re-manufacturing and the third-party-reverse logistics (3PRL) providers collecting and (iii) disturbances in customer demand. Furthermore, Neto et al (2010) argued that the primary objective of CLSCs is to improve the maximum economic benefit from end-of-use products.…”
Section: Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%