2016
DOI: 10.5194/tc-10-2623-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic influence of pinning points on marine ice-sheet stability: a numerical study in Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica

Abstract: Abstract. The East Antarctic ice sheet is likely more stable than its West Antarctic counterpart because its bed is largely lying above sea level. However, the ice sheet in Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica, contains marine sectors that are in contact with the ocean through overdeepened marine basins interspersed by grounded ice promontories and ice rises, pinning and stabilising the ice shelves. In this paper, we use the ice-sheet model BISICLES to investigate the effect of sub-ice-shelf melting, using a se… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(82 reference statements)
2
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of a sub-grid fjord treatment does not allow for a proper analysis of the ice front processes which become relevant when the retreat has reached the continental area above the sea level. Especially when, as in our case, the submarine melt goes abruptly to a high value at the grounding line, the implementation of a sub-grid-scale parameterization would allow the small processes at the fjords to be accurately resolved (Calov et al, 2015;Favier et al, 2016;Gladstone et al, 2017). However, these limitations lead to only secondorder effects given the scope of our work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The lack of a sub-grid fjord treatment does not allow for a proper analysis of the ice front processes which become relevant when the retreat has reached the continental area above the sea level. Especially when, as in our case, the submarine melt goes abruptly to a high value at the grounding line, the implementation of a sub-grid-scale parameterization would allow the small processes at the fjords to be accurately resolved (Calov et al, 2015;Favier et al, 2016;Gladstone et al, 2017). However, these limitations lead to only secondorder effects given the scope of our work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In subsequent decades, the BIS gradually readvanced and reestablished contact with the bedrock at the MIR, whilst velocities decreased to pre-1970 levels (Gudmundsson et al, 2017). This cycle of internal dynamical change controlled by calving-induced unpinning and subsequent regrounding at the MIR is arguably not a unique phenomenon, as many ice shelves around Antarctica, and in particular in Dronning Maud Land, are controlled by the presence of one or several pinning points (Matsuoka et al, 2015;Fürst et al, 2015;Favier et al, 2016;Berger et al, 2016). However, the long observational record and the relatively short calving frequency on the order of decades makes the BIS an ideal location to study this cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(22). Given the relatively low spatial resolution of a large-scale ice sheet model, small pinning points underneath ice shelves due to small bathymetric rises scraping the bottom of the ice and exerting an extra back pressure on the ice shelf Favier et al, 2016) are not taken into account. To overcome this a simple parametrization based on the standard deviation of observed bathymetry within each model cell was accounted for to introduce a given amount of basal friction of the ice shelf (Pollard and DeConto, 2012a).…”
Section: Calving and Sub-shelf Pinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then several marine ice sheet models of the Antarctic ice sheet have been developed, with varying ways of treating the grounding line, i.e. by increasing locally spatial resolution at the grounding line (Favier et al, 2014;Cornford et al, 2015), by making use of local interpolation strategies at the grounding line (Feldmann et al, 2014;Feldmann and Levermann, 2015;Golledge et al, 2015;Winkelmann et al, 2015) or by parametrizing grounding-line flux based on boundary layer theory (Pollard and DeConto, 2009;Pollard et al, 2015;DeConto and Pollard, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%