2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.12.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic force spectroscopy of the digoxigenin–antibody complex

Abstract: Small ligands and their receptors are widely used noncovalent couplers in various biotech applications. One prominent example, the digoxigenin-antibody complex, was often used to immobilize samples for single molecule force measurements by optical trap or AFM. Here, we employed dynamic AFM spectroscopy to demonstrate that a single digoxigenin-antibody bond is likely to fail even under moderate loading rates. This effect potentially could lower the yield of measurements or even obscure the unbinding data of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
140
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
15
140
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Supporting this interpretation, the measured transitionstate distance d of Ϸ0.6 nm that the center of mass of the double-headed molecule has to be moved for the limiting transition to occur (see Fig. 3D) is comparable to the distances measured for breaking molecular interfaces in proteins or antibody-antigen interactions (30,31).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Supporting this interpretation, the measured transitionstate distance d of Ϸ0.6 nm that the center of mass of the double-headed molecule has to be moved for the limiting transition to occur (see Fig. 3D) is comparable to the distances measured for breaking molecular interfaces in proteins or antibody-antigen interactions (30,31).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…For a lower loading rate the rupture force was found to be lower. For a-DIG/DIG a rupture force of 30-40 pN was found for a loading rate of 10 3 pN/s (Neuert et al, 2006), which corresponds well to our data, and would suggest that we indeed observe single a-DIG/DIG binding events.…”
Section: Localization Of Dig Molecules On Asupporting
confidence: 86%
“…5 B and C), consistent with mechanochemistry taking place as the cantilever breaks a covalent bond when it retracts (18). The median breakage force for the covalent interaction was 1.9 nN, which is >20 times stronger than streptavidin-biotin or antibody-antigen interactions (20,21). C-N and C-C bonds are not predicted to break until 5 nN (18), so it is likely that was not the isopeptide bond, nor another bond in the protein which broke, but rather a weaker link in the chain, such as a C-S bond linking the proteins to the cantilever/ bead.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%