2010
DOI: 10.1002/adem.201000055
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Dynamic Collapse Mechanisms in Metal Foam Expansion

Abstract: The study provides insight into decomposition of titanium hydride as foaming agent for powder metallurgically produced aluminum foams. Decomposition is characterized using thermal and kinetic analysis, allowing prediction of decomposition reactions. Such predictions are made for various time–temperature cycles, which are experimentally evaluated in parallel foaming experiments. A new explanation of foam collapse is derived from the results, which interprets hints at a maximum gas release rate, limiting maximum… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
7
7
1
0

Citation Types

0
18
0
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
11
1
1

Relationship

1
12

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 13 publications

(18 citation statements)
references

References 20 publications

0
18
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When two bubbles come into close contact, depending on forces which act upon them, they may undergo coalescence or remain separate. In the present model, the possibility for this bifurcation in dynamic behavior, which plays a key role in structure evolution in multi-bubble systems, is controlled via inequality (15). This issue is addressed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…4. Test of the coalescence condition, inequality (15). In panel (a) bubbles remain separated throughout the entire process of growth and deformation because, in addition to choosing a high σ SS , the phase fields representing the two bubbles are not allowed to merge into a single one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In panel (a) bubbles remain separated throughout the entire process of growth and deformation because, in addition to choosing a high σ SS , the phase fields representing the two bubbles are not allowed to merge into a single one. In (b) and (c), however, this possibility is introduced via the coalescence condition, inequality (15). The only difference between (b) and (c) is the use of different initial bubble-densities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, the system minimizes its free energy by keeping the bubbles apart. Starting with the same configuration as in panel (a), simulations are repeated using the coalescence condition, inequality (15). Two very similar cases that differ only in the initial gas density are considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…When two bubbles come into close contact, depending on forces which act upon them, they may undergo coalescence or remain separate. In the present model, the possibility for this bifurcation in dynamic behavior, which plays a key role in structure evolution in multi-bubble systems, is controlled via inequality (15). This issue is addressed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…4. Test of the coalescence condition, inequality (15). In panel (a) bubbles remain separated throughout the entire process of growth and deformation because, in addition to choosing a high σ SS , the phase fields representing the two bubbles are not allowed to merge into a single one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In panel (a) bubbles remain separated throughout the entire process of growth and deformation because, in addition to choosing a high σ SS , the phase fields representing the two bubbles are not allowed to merge into a single one. In (b) and (c), however, this possibility is introduced via the coalescence condition, inequality (15). The only difference between (b) and (c) is the use of different initial bubble-densities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, the system minimizes its free energy by keeping the bubbles apart. Starting with the same configuration as in panel (a), simulations are repeated using the coalescence condition, inequality (15). Two very similar cases that differ only in the initial gas density are considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…The latter have been obtained by means of blowing agents adapted in their thermal decomposition characteristics via thermal treatments. The details and effects of such treatments have been described by various authors, including those of the present work . Likewise, the impact of such measures on foam formation has been discussed in detail in several studies .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.