2003
DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20030701-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Thirty adult dry-bone ilium specimens were used in conjunction with computer analysis to determine the average articular contact area between the sacrum and ilium at the sacroiliac joint. Simulating an unstable pelvic injury, the sacroiliac joint was displaced in three directions by moving the ilium posteriorly, superiorly, and posterosuperiorly. After each displacement, the contact area between the sacrum and ilium at the sacroiliac joint was calculated. The data showed that the average articular surface area… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In men, the surface area of the SIJ joint surface is about 13% larger than in women (average area in men 1138.3 mm 2 compared to average area in women 992.5 mm 2 ) 11 .…”
Section: Anatomy Of the Sijmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In men, the surface area of the SIJ joint surface is about 13% larger than in women (average area in men 1138.3 mm 2 compared to average area in women 992.5 mm 2 ) 11 .…”
Section: Anatomy Of the Sijmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Die Oberflächengröße der Gelenkfläche des ISG ist bei Männern (1138,3 mm 2 im Durchschnitt) um ca. 13 % größer als bei Frauen (992,5 mm 2 im Durchschnitt) [11].…”
Section: Anatomie Des Iliosakralgelenksunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is an anatomically atypical joint in many aspects (Ebraheim et al, 2003; Mahato, 2016). Positional and dimensional variability of the sacroiliac (SI) articulation in general and as found in association with sacral dysmorphisms, are very common and have been topics of morphological and biomechanical studies (Mahato, 2010; Vleeming et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%