2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Bayesian network based approach for risk analysis of hydrogen generation unit leakage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The possibility of data tampering, in which nefarious individuals try to alter the information gathered about the production, use, and storage of hydrogen. This could cause erroneous forecasts and interfere with the system's functionality [47]. • The manufacturing and storage systems for hydrogen are becoming more and more vulnerable to hackers.…”
Section: Discussion Comparison and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The possibility of data tampering, in which nefarious individuals try to alter the information gathered about the production, use, and storage of hydrogen. This could cause erroneous forecasts and interfere with the system's functionality [47]. • The manufacturing and storage systems for hydrogen are becoming more and more vulnerable to hackers.…”
Section: Discussion Comparison and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The states of the technical factors of the investigated ship are divided into three types: normal (N), partial failure (PF) and failure (F). According to the statistical law, the failure probability of ship equipment is in alignment with a negative exponential distribution (Chang et al [65]). Due to the time limit of the ship's pilotage operations process, the equipment's maintenance rate is not considered when determining the state transition probability, so only the failure rate of equipment is considered: λ 1 (N to F), λ 2 (N to PF), λ 3 (PF to F).…”
Section: Establishment Of Transition Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…optical, acoustic, thermal, electrochemical) and several types of sensors exist (Najjar, 2019), there are currently no commercially available sensors that can detect hydrogen leakage at levels well below the threshold for hydrogen gas flammability which is required to characterize leakage in the open. Numerical studies also analyse hydrogen leakage through a safety perspective (Hajji et al, 2015;Parvini and Gharagouzlou, 2015;Chang et al, 2019;Qian et al, 2020) and small leaks of a buoyant gas will likely require new methods to accurately characterize actual leak rates (ppb level as opposed to ppm level).…”
Section: Hydrogen Leakage Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%