2004
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2908-03.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Analysis of Learning in Behavioral Experiments

Abstract: Understanding how an animal's ability to learn relates to neural activity or is altered by lesions, different attentional states, pharmacological interventions, or genetic manipulations are central questions in neuroscience. Although learning is a dynamic process, current analyses do not use dynamic estimation methods, require many trials across many animals to establish the occurrence of learning, and provide no consensus as how best to identify when learning has occurred. We develop a state-space model parad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
341
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(344 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(66 reference statements)
2
341
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, if β = 0, so that there is no relation between the continuous performance measure and the cognitive state, then (7)- (11) simplify to the recursive filter algorithm for estimating an unobservable cognitive state process from binary performance measures given in Smith et al 2004Smith et al ,2005.…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, if β = 0, so that there is no relation between the continuous performance measure and the cognitive state, then (7)- (11) simplify to the recursive filter algorithm for estimating an unobservable cognitive state process from binary performance measures given in Smith et al 2004Smith et al ,2005.…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the continuous performance measure or reaction time process (2), we chose the parameters α = 1.0489, β = −0.2165, and = 0.4944, and for the binary observation models or series of correct or incorrect responses, (4) we chose γ = 0.99 and μ = −0.5. Because a state-space model of the form we proposed here has not been previously reported, we determined these parameter values for the simulated model based on preliminary analyses of performance data from the experiments described in (Wirth et al 2003;Smith et al 2004Smith et al ,2007. We learned from these analyses that parameter values such as the ones chosen here would generate performance data that were consistent with those reported when learning occurred.…”
Section: Mixed Filter Analysis Of a Simulated Learning Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations