2019
DOI: 10.26492/gbs71(suppl.2).2019-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durianology, discovery, and saltation — the evolution of aroids

Abstract: If we become attentive to natural objects, particularly living ones, in such a manner as to desire to achieve an insight into the correlation of their nature and activity, we believe ourselves best able to come to such a comprehension through a division of the parts, and this method is suitable to take us very far. With but a word one may remind the friends of science of what chemistry and anatomy have contributed to an intensive and extensive view of Nature... But these analytic efforts, continued indefinitel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a volume honouring my undergraduate tutor, David Mabberley, it seems appropriate to use as a jumping-off point, . This paper, like other papers by these authors (Hay & Mabberley, 1991;Hay, 2019 in this volume), challenges the instinct to fragment a plant into parts. Instead, it argues for 'process morphology', an outlook that downplays the idea that organisms have discrete parts assignable to one of a few discrete flavours in favour of an emphasis on the dynamic nature of development.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In a volume honouring my undergraduate tutor, David Mabberley, it seems appropriate to use as a jumping-off point, . This paper, like other papers by these authors (Hay & Mabberley, 1991;Hay, 2019 in this volume), challenges the instinct to fragment a plant into parts. Instead, it argues for 'process morphology', an outlook that downplays the idea that organisms have discrete parts assignable to one of a few discrete flavours in favour of an emphasis on the dynamic nature of development.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Some floral terminology used in this paper differs intentionally from those of previous papers on Pothos and is intended to pave the way to interpreting the 'inflorescence' of Pothos, and indeed of all other aroids, as a unique array of structures that are neither flowers nor inflorescences as defined by current prevailing orthodoxy, but something of both. For the background to this conceptual change see Hay (2019), Hay and Mabberley (1991), Mabberley and Hay (1994). The 'pedicellarums' described in this paper are perhaps particularly germane as they present some of the inflorescences or blooms, and flowers or florets of Araceae that most resemble, at least to first glance, racemose inflorescences of more or less standard pedicellate trimerous monocotyledonous flowers of text books.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…They derive from complex splitting of a ‘simple’ and virtually entire blade as the leaf unfurls after emergence, which is why the leaflets at the margin are truncate with two ‘tips’. This is unique to Pseudohydrosme / Anchomanes ( Hay, 2019 : 285). Differences between Pseudohydrosme and Anchomanes are re-assessed in the discussion below.…”
Section: Taxonomic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 95%