2005
Duration of Lactation and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes
Abstract: Context Lactation is associated with improved glucose and insulin homeostasis, independent of weight change.Objective To evaluate the association between lactation history and incidence of type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective observational cohort study of 83 585 parous women in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and retrospective observational cohort study of 73 418 parous women in the Nurses' Health Study II (NHS II). Main Outcome Measure Incident cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Resul…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
383
64
53
8
Citation Types
15
268
5
7
Year Published
2000
2026
Publication Types
Select...
394
40
30
12
Relationship
8
468
Authors
Journals
Cited by 476 publications
(295 citation statements)
References 31 publications
15
268
5
7
“…When we combined parity history and breastfeeding history, we observed that women with five or more term pregnancies had increased diabetes risk, regardless of breastfeeding duration, but that women with one to four term pregnancies did not have higher diabetes risk when they breastfed more than 12 months in total or each child more than 3 months. Our findings are consistent with previous studies ( 9 , 22 ). For example, a prospective study among 52,731women observed that compared with nulliparous women, parous women who did not breastfeed had greater risk of diabetes (odds ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.26–1.73, P < 0.001), whereas among parous women who breastfed, the risk for diabetes was not significantly increased ( 9 ).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…When we combined parity history and breastfeeding history, we observed that women with five or more term pregnancies had increased diabetes risk, regardless of breastfeeding duration, but that women with one to four term pregnancies did not have higher diabetes risk when they breastfed more than 12 months in total or each child more than 3 months. Our findings are consistent with previous studies ( 9 , 22 ). For example, a prospective study among 52,731women observed that compared with nulliparous women, parous women who did not breastfeed had greater risk of diabetes (odds ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.26–1.73, P < 0.001), whereas among parous women who breastfed, the risk for diabetes was not significantly increased ( 9 ).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Our findings are consistent with recent studies showing that the favourable effects of lactation on maternal metabolic health persist post weaning [7,8,11,17-20] and thereby further supporting the notion that lactation may induce long-term beneficial effects on maternal blood pressure, weight [21], diabetes [6,18], components of the metabolic syndrome [5,19] and cardiovascular health [7,11,17]. Previous studies have shown that the beneficial effect of lactation on cardiovascular risk factors seems to wane with time since last birth [6,11,18].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Other large prospective studies suggest risk reductions in diabetes of ∼15–20% per year of lactation (1–3); our findings concur with this estimate. There is less consistency among studies examining the association between parity and diabetes, with some suggesting either no effect (8) or a small (9) to moderate (10,11) increase in risk.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results confirm previous work suggesting that parous women who breastfeed can reduce their risk of developing type 2 diabetes in later life and that the benefit increases the longer the duration of breastfeeding (1–3). What is novel is, compared with nulliparous women, women who have children but do not breastfeed have an increased risk of diabetes in later life; however, this excess risk may be avoided in women who breastfeed.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
