2018
DOI: 10.1101/508481
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duffy Antigen Expression in Erythroid Bone Marrow Precursor Cells of Genotypically Duffy Negative Individuals

Abstract: Tel : +33 (0)1 44 49 31 47 (Dial 0 only within France) SignificanceDuffy blood group negativity results from a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the gene promoter, and reaches genetic fixation in many African ethnicities. Because the Duffy protein (Fy) is an important contact point during Plasmodium vivax human red blood cell invasion, Fy-negativity is considered to confer resistance to P. vivax malaria.With recent studies in African countries reporting P. vivax infection in Fy-negative people, we studie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some DARCindividuals may not be fully Duffynull, as residual RNA transcription may still happen marginally (Popovici et al, 2020). This phenomenon has recently been described in bone marrow-derived DARC -RBC progenitors (Dechavanne et al, 2018). The possibility that some very immature DARCreticulocytes in the bone marrow, but also in peripheral blood (Thomson-Luque et al, 2018), harbor marginal expression of DARC tempts us to speculate that they may be the explanation behind the possibility of transmission between Duffyindividuals infected with P. vivax.…”
Section: Young Reticulocytes: the Keystone For P Vivax Infection Of The Duffy Negative African Population?mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Some DARCindividuals may not be fully Duffynull, as residual RNA transcription may still happen marginally (Popovici et al, 2020). This phenomenon has recently been described in bone marrow-derived DARC -RBC progenitors (Dechavanne et al, 2018). The possibility that some very immature DARCreticulocytes in the bone marrow, but also in peripheral blood (Thomson-Luque et al, 2018), harbor marginal expression of DARC tempts us to speculate that they may be the explanation behind the possibility of transmission between Duffyindividuals infected with P. vivax.…”
Section: Young Reticulocytes: the Keystone For P Vivax Infection Of The Duffy Negative African Population?mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Although there are numerous other explanations, all three of these explanations are consistent with previous work that suggests P. vivax infections among Duffy-negative individuals are frequently mild and asymptomatic compared with Duffy-positive individuals 5,6 . Finally, emerging research suggests that genotypically Duffy-negative hosts express the Duffy antigen among erythroid progenitors in the bone marrow and that P. vivax gametocytes are able to mature and proliferate in the bone marrow of non-human primate animal models 30,31 . Collectively, this suggests that P. vivax in SSA may be persisting as low parasitemic, asymptomatic infections, by hiding in the bone marrow or other tissues containing early progenitor red blood cells of Duffy-negative hosts [30][31][32] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it can be speculated that although the −67 T to C mutation reduces the binding of the GATA-1 transcription factor and therefore transcription of the gene, this reduction might not be complete and RNA transcription could still be occurring at very low levels, leading to an amount of Duffy protein below the limit of detection of current analytical tools. Some recent data suggest that Duffy protein is notably detectable in erythroid precursor cells typically found in the bone marrow where P. vivax invasion is believed to occur to some extent [85][86][87]. It is worth mentioning here that Duffy-negative people do express the Duffy protein in other cell types such as in endothelial cells, indicating that the expression of Duffy is not intrinsically abolished by the −67 T to C mutation [23,88].…”
Section: Human Side: Alternate Receptor or Duffy Involvement?mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, what has not been definitely ruled out and is perhaps the most parsimonious explanation for the mechanisms of Duffy-negative invasion is that the Duffy-negative phenotype is not Duffy null [85]. Indeed, it can be speculated that although the −67 T to C mutation reduces the binding of the GATA-1 transcription factor and therefore transcription of the gene, this reduction might not be complete and RNA transcription could still be occurring at very low levels, leading to an amount of Duffy protein below the limit of detection of current analytical tools.…”
Section: Human Side: Alternate Receptor or Duffy Involvement?mentioning
confidence: 99%