2020
DOI: 10.1145/3372299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duality between Unprovability and Provability in Forward Refutation-search for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic

Abstract: The inverse method is a saturation based theorem proving technique; it relies on a forward proof-search strategy and can be applied to cut-free calculi enjoying the subformula property. Here we apply this method to derive the unprovability of a goal formula G in Intuitionistic Propositional Logic. To this aim we design a forward calculus FRJ(G) for Intuitionistic unprovability which is prone to constructively ascertain the unprovability of a formula G by providing a concise countermodel for it; in particular w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, intuitR requires 45 calls to the SAT-solvers, 8 restarts and yields a countermodel consisting of 4 worlds; the set W contains 26 worlds before the first restart, one world before the remaining ones. With all the benchmarks the models generated during the computation are small (typically, big models occur before the first restart); however, differently from [7,8,9], we cannot guarantee that countermodels have minimum depth or minimum number of worlds. To complete the picture, the scatter plot in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, intuitR requires 45 calls to the SAT-solvers, 8 restarts and yields a countermodel consisting of 4 worlds; the set W contains 26 worlds before the first restart, one world before the remaining ones. With all the benchmarks the models generated during the computation are small (typically, big models occur before the first restart); however, differently from [7,8,9], we cannot guarantee that countermodels have minimum depth or minimum number of worlds. To complete the picture, the scatter plot in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Likewise, in [Fiorentini and Ferrari, 2018], Fiorentini and Ferrari explore the duality between unprovability and provability in forward proof-search for intuitionistic propositional logic, following on their previous, already mentioned work [Fiorentini and Ferrari, 2017].…”
Section: Systems Combining Proofs and Refutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though with different motivation and agenda, and with no technical results of the type pursued here, this work appears to be the closest in spirit to the idea of hybrid deduction-refutation systems studied in the present work. • Likewise, in [15], Fiorentini and Ferrari explore the duality between unprovability and provability in forward proof-search for intuitionistic propositional logic and develop a refutation-complete sequent-based forward refutation calculus for it, following on their previous work [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%