2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-task interference: Attentional and neurophysiological influences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well established that performing two tasks simultaneously often degrades performance of one or both tasks, potentially due to competition for shared attentional resources [43]. In the current study performance of the dominant hand became more variable as the involvement of the non-dominant hand increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It is well established that performing two tasks simultaneously often degrades performance of one or both tasks, potentially due to competition for shared attentional resources [43]. In the current study performance of the dominant hand became more variable as the involvement of the non-dominant hand increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Capacity theories of attention that assume attentional resource limitations on the ability to perform multiple tasks simultaneously (Kahneman, 1973; McDowd, 2007; Hiraga et al, 2009) would predict even greater decrements in steadiness for older adults when descending drive from the motor cortex increased during the 30% MVC task and as the fatiguing contraction progressed. Interestingly, error rates in mental math (executive function task) during the fatiguing contraction did not differ across the age groups for the low-cognitive demand sessions and high-cognitive demand, indicating that mental math performance was not diminished in the older adults compared with the young.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others found no dual-task specific brain areas, but an increased activation of the areas that are active in both single tasks (Van Impe et al, 2011). TMS studies show that performing a motor task in upper (or lower) extremity increases corticospinal excitability (Hiraga et al, 2009) and decreases corticospinal inhibition (Sohn et al, 2005) to lower (or upper) extremity muscles. Although this activity-dependent coupling may mediate some of the dual task interference in dual motor tasks, it is not sensitive to several task modulations that do influence behavioral outcome measures (Hiraga et al, 2009).…”
Section: Relationship Between Structural and Functional Changes And Pmentioning
confidence: 99%