1995
DOI: 10.1029/95gl01099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual porosity fracture flow and transport

Abstract: In rock masses where fracture flow greatly exceeds flow through the rock matrix, the matrix provides a storage porosity which needs to be considered for transient flow, and for solute transport. This paper presents a dual‐porosity, single permeability approach for evaluation of flow and transport in fractured rock. The fracture network flow approach is based on a generic matrix block similar to the method of Warren and Root (1963), applied to realistic fracture geometries. The solute transport approach is base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter step will rely on the Green's functions derived in this study. Heat transfer in fracture networks. Multiscale modeling approaches to flow and transport in fractured rocks [e.g., Dershowitz and Miller , ; Cvetkovic et al , ; Roubinet et al , , ] combine a discrete fracture network (DFN) representation at the field scale with analytical solutions at the fracture scale. We will embed our analytical solutions into particle‐tracking DFN models to represent rock conduction effects at the field scale with optimized computational cost and representation accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter step will rely on the Green's functions derived in this study. Heat transfer in fracture networks. Multiscale modeling approaches to flow and transport in fractured rocks [e.g., Dershowitz and Miller , ; Cvetkovic et al , ; Roubinet et al , , ] combine a discrete fracture network (DFN) representation at the field scale with analytical solutions at the fracture scale. We will embed our analytical solutions into particle‐tracking DFN models to represent rock conduction effects at the field scale with optimized computational cost and representation accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow interaction between a permeable rock and embedded conductive fractures remains poorly understood since earlier research either investigated fractures only [e.g., Smith and Schwartz , 1993], focused on idealized synthetic fracture geometries [ Bogdanov et al , 2003], or applied a dual porosity approach assuming a stagnant matrix [ Kazemi and Gilman , 1993; Dershowitz and Miller , 1995]. It is also difficult to monitor fracture flow in experiments [ Renard et al , 2001].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is dealt with "realist" complex networks and not with dual-porosity approaches [ Warren and Root, 1963;Dershowitz and Miller, 1995] …”
Section: Solving Of Advection-dispersion and Matrix Diffusion Of Solutementioning
confidence: 99%