2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-016-6341-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-polarimetric C-band SAR data for land use/land cover classification by incorporating textural information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For all four single features, overall accuracies were lower than 80% except for the value obtained using T. Although the overall accuracy of T was higher than 85%, the corresponding F1 measures of GRA and BIS were lower than 85%, which indicates that four single features could not meet the requirements of urban land cover classification. Consistent with previous studies, classification accuracy of less than 85% when using single polarization image [ 46 ] and using only coherence features [ 92 ]. The classification accuracy of the backscatter intensity features in this study was higher than previous studies using only single-date dual-polarimetric SAR data [ 93 ], mainly due to the use of multi-temporal SAR data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For all four single features, overall accuracies were lower than 80% except for the value obtained using T. Although the overall accuracy of T was higher than 85%, the corresponding F1 measures of GRA and BIS were lower than 85%, which indicates that four single features could not meet the requirements of urban land cover classification. Consistent with previous studies, classification accuracy of less than 85% when using single polarization image [ 46 ] and using only coherence features [ 92 ]. The classification accuracy of the backscatter intensity features in this study was higher than previous studies using only single-date dual-polarimetric SAR data [ 93 ], mainly due to the use of multi-temporal SAR data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As shown in Table 4 , the classification accuracy using T was highest, with an overall accuracy of 89.08% (kappa coefficient = 0.8621), followed by VV + VH and C2. Compared with the previous studies [ 46 , 90 ], the classification accuracy of the texture features in this study was higher mainly because each individual texture feature was calculated using their corresponding best window. Although C1 had the worst performance (with an overall accuracy of 58.45% and a kappa coefficient of 0.4734) of the four single features, it could distinguish urban impervious surfaces (BIS and DIS) well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study selected training and testing samples through field research and defined region of interest (ROI) files by ENVI 5.0 software for different land cover categories using ground true data [33]. To ensure the accuracy of the samples, the training and testing samples were selected and validated as follows: (1) the sample type was determined through the first field research and an analysis of land use, (2) the sample type and regions were confirmed further with HJ-1/CCD images and high-resolution images from Google Earth, and (3) the sample types and region accuracy were further confirmed through a second field survey with the same research route.…”
Section: Samples Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has an ability to classify large datasets since it considers dimensionality reduction procedures and also handles missing and outlier values [33]. This classifier's performance is comparable to that of other classifiers like Support Vector Machine and is better than many other classifiers like Maximum Likelihood Classifier [34] and Artificial Neural Network [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%