2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30048-7_10
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Hashing-Based Algorithms for Discrete Integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To accomplish an efficient procedure, we need to tackle three challenges: Figure 1: Feature model of graph library Challenge 1: Representation of weights over assignment space To represent weights over assignment space, we turn to a literal-weighted function that assigns a non-negative weight to every literal such that the weight of an assignment is the product of the weight of its literal. The choice of literalweighted function is primarily motivated due to the observation that a wide variety of distributions arising from diverse disciplines can be represented as literal-weight function [13,20].…”
Section: Adaptive Weighted Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accomplish an efficient procedure, we need to tackle three challenges: Figure 1: Feature model of graph library Challenge 1: Representation of weights over assignment space To represent weights over assignment space, we turn to a literal-weighted function that assigns a non-negative weight to every literal such that the weight of an assignment is the product of the weight of its literal. The choice of literalweighted function is primarily motivated due to the observation that a wide variety of distributions arising from diverse disciplines can be represented as literal-weight function [13,20].…”
Section: Adaptive Weighted Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unavailability of MaxSAT solvers with native support for XORs has hindered the scalability of WISH style techniques. A dual approach proposed by Chakraborty et al [8,16] reduces discrete integration to linearly many counting queries over formulas wherein each of counting query is constructed by conjunction of F with Pseudo-Boolean constraints, which is shown to scale poorly [38]. In summary, there exists a wide gap in the theory and practice of hashing-based approaches for discrete integration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%