1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6377(98)00050-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual decomposition in stochastic integer programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
293
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
293
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an area of future research. In the future we also intend to combine our approaches, polynomial time algorithms and polyhedral studies, into decomposition frameworks for large size stochastic integer programming problems, such as those studied by Carøe (1998) and Sen and Sherali (2006) (among others).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an area of future research. In the future we also intend to combine our approaches, polynomial time algorithms and polyhedral studies, into decomposition frameworks for large size stochastic integer programming problems, such as those studied by Carøe (1998) and Sen and Sherali (2006) (among others).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(132), (133) and (134)) non-anticipativity (NA) constraints. If these NA constraints are either relaxed or dualized using Lagrangean decomposition, then the problem decomposes into smaller subproblems that can be solved independently for each scenario within an iterative scheme for the multipliers as described in Carøe and Schultz (1999) and in Gupta and Grossmann (2011). In this way, we can effectively decompose and solve the …”
Section: Solution Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method uses a transformed space in which tender variables (χ = T x) are used to partition the problem using a hyperrectangular partitioning process. The method by Carøe and Tind (1997) and Carøe (1998) uses disjunctive programming to derive cutting-planes under the EF (problem 3) setting and requires continuous first-stage and mixed-binary second-stage decision variables. An extension of the method for SIP with pure binary first-stage and mixed-binary secondstage decision variables is also proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be pointed out that Theorem 3.3 is a more general form of the common-cut-coefficients (C3) theorem (Sen and Higle, 2005) for SIP with fixed recourse. Unlike here where we generate valid inequalities in the y(ω)-space, Carøe and Tind (1997) and Carøe (1998) derive a similar theorem but for generating cuts in the (x, y(ω))-space based on the extensive formulation (3). Thus the method developed in this paper is different from that of Carøe and Tind (1997) and Carøe (1998).…”
Section: Is a Finite Collection Of Appropriately Dimensioned Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%