1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(99)00179-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drying shrinkage of fibre-reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete containing fly ash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the higher drying shrinkage of light weight hybrid composites than that of premix mortar is due to higher cement content, lower sand content and higher water/cement ratio. Similar results are also reported by Kayali et al [12] where the drying shrinkage of light weight FRC was found twice as compared to normal weight concrete. The light weight hybrid composites containing FL1 type light weight sand exhibited slightly higher drying shrinkage than the one containing FL0 type light weight sand.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, the higher drying shrinkage of light weight hybrid composites than that of premix mortar is due to higher cement content, lower sand content and higher water/cement ratio. Similar results are also reported by Kayali et al [12] where the drying shrinkage of light weight FRC was found twice as compared to normal weight concrete. The light weight hybrid composites containing FL1 type light weight sand exhibited slightly higher drying shrinkage than the one containing FL0 type light weight sand.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For high-strength LWAFRC, the bers did not signicantly contribute to the compressive strength [21]. In addition, there was no signi cant increase in the compressive strength of the hardened lightweight self-compacting concrete due to the addition of polypropylene bers [22].…”
Section: Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Specimens with diameter sizes varying from 76, 100, 150, and 200 mm increased in splitting tensile strength of 134%, 33%, 12%, and 0%, respectively, for normal concrete and 127%, 165%, 44%, and 29% for lightweight concrete, respectively [11]. Fiber reinforcement signi cantly increases the tensile strength of lightweight aggregate concrete [21].…”
Section: Splitting Tensile Strengthmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the lightweight aggregate concrete becomes more brittle as its strength increases making its engineering application subject to many restrictions. Numerous studies at home and abroad (O Kayali et al, 1999;Hua, 1998;Ding & Yang, 2006;Liu et al, 2009) have shown that high elastic modulus steel fibers, compared with low elastic modulus steel fibers, can effectively suppress the shrinkage crack of lightweight aggregate concrete, and can increase the tensile strength and toughness of concrete. However, synthetic fibers such as PP play a unique role in solving early-stage plastic cracking and reducing the drying shrinkage and deformation of concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%