2016
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug repositioning based on comprehensive similarity measures and Bi-Random walk algorithm

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
273
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
273
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to control or prevent the diseases, people try to use disease similarity and drug repositioning to gain deeper insights into pathogenic mechanisms of complex diseases [1–3]. However, in clinical practice, there are particularity and complexity between similar diseases, and there are limitations in drug repositioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to control or prevent the diseases, people try to use disease similarity and drug repositioning to gain deeper insights into pathogenic mechanisms of complex diseases [1–3]. However, in clinical practice, there are particularity and complexity between similar diseases, and there are limitations in drug repositioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, they usually do not guarantee that the trained models are unbiased with respect to unseen data. For instance, Luo et al 11 use an independent set of drug-disease associations, yet, 95% of the drugs in the independent set are also in the original data set (109 out of 115). On the other hand, Gottlieb et al 4 create the folds such that 10% of the drugs are hidden instead of 10% of the drug-disease pairs, but they do not ensure that the drugs used to train the model are disjoint from the drugs in the test set.…”
Section: Revisiting Cross Validation Using Disjoint Foldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies often combine various features including but not limited to chemical 2D fingerprint similarity, overlap or interaction network closeness of drug targets and correlation between drug side effects and build a machine learning model based on different algorithms, such as support vector machines, random forests and logistic regression classifiers. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The proposed models are then compared in a cross validation setting, in which a portion of the known drug-disease associations are hidden during training and used for the validation afterwards. The areas under reciver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in the cross validation analysis reported for these models range between 75-95%, suggesting that some of these models can accurately identify novel drugdisease associations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, how to deal with this problem becomes an emerging issue. Over decades, different computational methods and tools [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have been developed to predict large-scale potential DTIs and drug repositing through the unremitting efforts of a large number of researchers and organizations under the development of computing technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%