2006
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug-induced conditioned place preference and aversion in mice

Abstract: This protocol describes the equipment and methods used to establish conditioned place preference (CPP) or aversion (CPA). Place conditioning is a form of Pavlovian conditioning routinely used to measure the rewarding or aversive motivational effects of objects or experiences (e.g., abused drugs). Here, we present a place conditioning procedure that has been used extensively to study the motivational effects of ethanol and other abused drugs in mice. This protocol involves three phases: (i) habituation (or a pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
434
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(453 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
434
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Place preference test was identical to the Baseline Test. In Experiments 1-3 this test served to index cocaine-CPP (Mucha et al, 1982;Itzhak and Martin, 2002;Cunningham et al, 2006), and in Experiment 4 it served to index LiCl-conditioned place aversion (CPA) (Martin and Itzhak, 2000;Parker and Mcdonald, 2000;Legastelois et al, 2015). Preference or avoidance was defined as an increase or a decrease, respectively, in the percent of time spent in the drug-paired compartment on the Place Preference Test 1, compared with the Baseline Test.…”
Section: Place Conditioning Counterconditioning and Reinstatementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Place preference test was identical to the Baseline Test. In Experiments 1-3 this test served to index cocaine-CPP (Mucha et al, 1982;Itzhak and Martin, 2002;Cunningham et al, 2006), and in Experiment 4 it served to index LiCl-conditioned place aversion (CPA) (Martin and Itzhak, 2000;Parker and Mcdonald, 2000;Legastelois et al, 2015). Preference or avoidance was defined as an increase or a decrease, respectively, in the percent of time spent in the drug-paired compartment on the Place Preference Test 1, compared with the Baseline Test.…”
Section: Place Conditioning Counterconditioning and Reinstatementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we assessed the capacity of counterconditioning given after retrieval of cocaine-associated memories (ie, during reconsolidation) to prevent relapse to cocaine seeking, using the CPP paradigm. This paradigm has been widely used to assess the rewarding properties of drugs (Mucha et al, 1982;Itzhak and Martin, 2002;Cunningham et al, 2006), and to model cue-induced craving and relapse through reinstatement of cocaine-CPP (Mueller and Stewart, 2000;Itzhak and Martin, 2002). Our modified place conditioning procedure consisted of two training phases: a cocaine place conditioning phase followed by an aversive place counterconditioning phase with LiCl, which is commonly used to induce CPA (Martin and Itzhak, 2000;Parker and Mcdonald, 2000).…”
Section: Experiments 1a and 1b: Aversive Counterconditioning During Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure was performed in eight Plexiglas cages covered with transparent lids with ventilation holes (Cunningham et al, 2006;Vashchinkina et al, 2012). Two types of preselected floor material (plastic 1.2-cm-wide flat bars separated by 0.5-cm gaps and a metal grid with 1-mm-spacing between wires) were used as conditioning stimuli.…”
Section: Behavioral Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During 15-min preliminary tests for material preference, naive mice showed no preference for either one of the floor materials (data not shown). Therefore, we followed the unbiased conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure (Cunningham et al, 2006). Three independent batches of adult mice were tested.…”
Section: Behavioral Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPP paradigm was used as described in (Nuutinen et al, 2010a) and it followed the principles of an unbiased, fully counterbalanced conditioning described by (Cunningham et al, 2006). Conditioning cages were individual transparent plastic cages (42 Â 26 Â 20 cm) covered with clear plastic lids with ventilation holes.…”
Section: Alcohol-induced Cppmentioning
confidence: 99%