1995
DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00253.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drosophila Polycomb-group regulated chromatin inhibits the accessibility of a trans-activator to its target DNA.

Abstract: The genes of the Polycomb‐group (Pc‐G) are responsible for maintaining the inactive expression state of homeotic genes. They act through specific cis‐regulatory DNA elements termed PREs (Pc‐G Response Elements). Multimeric complexes containing the Pc‐G proteins are thought to induce heterochromatin‐like structures, which stably and heritably inactivate transcription. We have tested the functional role of the FAB fragment, a PRE of the bithorax complex. We find that this element behaves as an orientation depend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
174
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the principles of gene silencing observed in Drosophila, where high doses of trans-activators can antagonize PcG-mediated silencing (61).…”
Section: Functional Interaction Of H-l(3)mbt and Tel-we Have Demonstrsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is consistent with the principles of gene silencing observed in Drosophila, where high doses of trans-activators can antagonize PcG-mediated silencing (61).…”
Section: Functional Interaction Of H-l(3)mbt and Tel-we Have Demonstrsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…By contrast, using a semiquantitative staining assay of whole Drosophila embryos, heterochromatin organized by Polycomb protein did not hamper expression of a -galactosidase transgene driven by T7 RNA polymerase (McCall and Bender, 1996). As a positive control, in the same system, a strong repression effect was found on activation by GAL4 factor (see also Zink and Paro, 1995). However, even within Drosophila, there are qualitative differences between telomeric and pericentric heterochromatin (Wallrath and Elgin, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some of the repressor/corepressor proteins of yeast, Drosophila and mammals act by interfering with the process of transcriptional initiation (Hanna-Rose and Hansen, 1996), whereas the so-called Polycomb-group proteins, which are required for maintenance of the repressed state of the homeotic genes in Drosophila development and also are present in mammalian cells, most likely function by inducing the packaging of theirtarget genes into transcriptionally inactive heterochromatin (e.g., Zink and Paro, 1995;Strutt ef a/., 1997). The term transcriptional silencing is often used to describe repression effects in eukaryotes, notably repression over long distances as first described for the yeast mating type locus by K. Nasmyth and colleagues (Brand etal., 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunostaining of ovaries was performed as described previously (57). Immunostaining of polytene squashes was performed as described previously (58).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%