Droplet digital PCR using HER2/EIF2C1 ratio for detection of HER2 amplification in breast cancer tissues

Abstract

Breast cancers with amplification and overexpression of human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are associated with poor prognosis, and targeted for anti-HER2 therapy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are currently the recommended methods to asses HER2 overexpression/amplification. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), a highly accurate method to quantify DNA copy number, is potentially a robust alternative for HER2 diagnostics. In the FISH assay and most of previous ddPCR reports, chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) has been used as the reference control to determine HER2/CEP17 ratio. Nevertheless, miss-classification could occur when HER2 is co-amplified with CEP17. To avoid this inherent defect, in the present study, we employed ddPCR assay using the human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2C1 (EIF2C1) gene located at chromosome 1p34.3 as the reference control to quantify HER2 copy number in 31 frozen breast cancer tissues. HER2 status of these samples had been determined by FISH and classified as HER2-amplified and HER2-non-amplified breast cancers. The results showed that HER2 determined by ddPCR using HER2/EIF2C1 ratio was in good concordance with HER2 determined by FISH using HER2/CEP17 ratio, the concordance rate 87.1% (27/31), Kappa = 0.719. The sensitivity and specificity of ddPCR assay was 90% (9/10) and 85.7% (18/21), respectively. The median HER2/EIF2C1 copy number ratio in HER2-amplified cancers (6.55, range 1.3–17.3) was significantly higher than in HER2-non-amplified cancers (1.05, range 0.6–3.6, p < 0.001). This study demonstrated that ddPCR using HER2/EIF2C1 ratio could accurately assess HER2 status in frozen breast cancer tissues. Thus, our findings warrant further studies into breast cancer with HER2-equivocal by IHC/FISH.

Comparative analysis of HER2 copy number between plasma and tissue samples in gastric cancer using droplet digital PCR

“…Compared with the previous studies that measured HER2 ratios of gastric cancer patients using ddPCR [19][20][21][22][23][24] , our study covered the largest cohort to the best of our knowledge; moreover, we worked with paired samples of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and preoperative plasma cfDNA. We used EIF2C1 as the reference gene, and ddPCR using the HER2/EIF2C1 ratio demonstrated that it can assess HER2 status accurately 25 .…”

Liquid Biopsy as Novel Tool in Precision Medicine: Origins, Properties, Identification and Clinical Perspective of Cancer’s Biomarkers

“…In melanoma is one promising biomarker the predictive value of ctDNA, in patients with metastatic melanoma, by quantitative analysis of plasma mutations of BRAF V600 has unique properties as a monitoring tool during treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, both as a predictor of response and treatment resistance [74,75]. LB based on ctDNA detection, such as digital PCR (ddPCR) assays, have demonstrated the clinical utility of ddPCR in determining HER2 mutations in breast cancer [38,58,76]. Finally, in pancreatic cancer, Cohen et al have shown that the analysis of KRAS gene mutations, using ctDNA, had greater diagnostic power than any single marker as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA); carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9); cancer antigen 125 (CA125) but it's not yet a reality in clinical practice [77].…”

Copy Number Variation and Rearrangements Assessment in Cancer: Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR with the Current Approaches

“…Absolute HER2 copy number can be determined by ddPCR without the need for calibration. So, ddPCR technique may be useful as an alternative to FISH and MLPA in HER2 diagnosis [ 103 ].…”