2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of genotype by environment interaction in radiata pine as indicated by multivariate regression trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way for doing this is the use of universal response functions (URFs) which predict provenance specific growth depending on the climate of the trial locations and the climatic conditions at the place of origin [32,33]. Multiple regression trees have served in a similar way as a tool to conclude about the performance of different provenances at given site conditions depending on the climate of origin [34,35]. The outcomes of these studies have been also proposed as a basis to adapt seed transfer guidelines to future climatic conditions [36,37].…”
Section: Provenance Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way for doing this is the use of universal response functions (URFs) which predict provenance specific growth depending on the climate of the trial locations and the climatic conditions at the place of origin [32,33]. Multiple regression trees have served in a similar way as a tool to conclude about the performance of different provenances at given site conditions depending on the climate of origin [34,35]. The outcomes of these studies have been also proposed as a basis to adapt seed transfer guidelines to future climatic conditions [36,37].…”
Section: Provenance Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies, generally conducted in contexts of using fertilisers where needed, have pointed to some different site variables as drivers of such interaction. Wu and Matheson (2005) pointed to altitude (elevation), as did Raymond (2011), whereas Gapare et al (2015) pointed to temperature with a secondary role of humidity, Ivković et al (2015) and Dutkowski et al (2016) to rainfall and temperature, and Li et al (2015) to mean annual temperature along with soil levels of nitrogen and total P. However, given the different sets of sites, and the auto correlations between site variables within those studies, there were probably no real inconsistencies among the findings. Also of interest would be interactions involving the 300 index (Kimberley et al 2005) which is a measure of whole-crop productivity as distinct from individualtree growth rate.…”
Section: Genotype × Sitementioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is on the basis of r B and its departures from +1 that RC interaction has been studied for radiata pine in recent years, being the focus of several major studies (e.g. Wu and Matheson 2005;Raymond 2011;Cullis et al 2014;Gapare et al 2015;Ivković et al 2015;Li et al 2015). Of these studies, all gave strong indications as to what factors were driving the RC interactions, except that of Cullis et al despite the power of its factor analytic method for analysing a very large multi-site dataset with troublesome data properties.…”
Section: The Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The provided guidance and several approaches to characterize patterns of GxE ensuing from MET analyses 82 with FA models, which include clustering sites based on the dissimilarity matrix of additive effects and 83 using a 'heatmap' to visualize patterns. Gapare et al (2015) attempted to further characterize patterns 84 of GxE from a MET analysis of radiata pine in New Zealand using hierarchical cluster analyses, multiple 85 regression tree models and climate data, and determined that minimum temperature was an important 86 driver of GxE in both progeny and provenance trials, and partitioned the target environment to optimize 87 deployment of selected material. 88…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%