2017
DOI: 10.1128/genomea.00881-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Draft Genome Sequence of the Phytopathogenic FungusFusarium euwallaceae, the Causal Agent ofFusariumDieback

Abstract: Here, we report the genome of Fusarium euwallaceae strain HFEW-16-IV-019, an isolate obtained from Kuroshio shot hole borer (a Euwallacea sp.). These beetles were collected in Tijuana, Mexico, from elm trees showing typical symptoms of Fusarium dieback. The final assembly consists of 287 scaffolds spanning 48,274,071 bp and 13,777 genes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently with previously reported, 13,777 CDS were predicted into the F . kuroshium genome [ 42 ]. The predicted number of genes for F .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistently with previously reported, 13,777 CDS were predicted into the F . kuroshium genome [ 42 ]. The predicted number of genes for F .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…associated with KSBH some of these PKS are represented by partial OFRs, we looked for their complete coding sequences in the genome of Fusarium sp. associated with KSBH which has been recently announced [ 70 ] and was generated from the same strain used in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…associated with KSBH that were collected in the locations of El Cajon, Fallbrook, Bonsall and Escondido, CA. It is important to mention that in a previous work [ 70 ] we named this strain as F. euwallaceae because until that time there were not enough genomic data available that allow us to infer the differences between the Fusarium strains associated with KSBH or PSHB [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference sequences used consisted on whole genome sequences and/or unique-transcript collections resulting from transcriptomic studies, available in public databases such as JGI ( [46,47]) and GeneBank (). Only available sequences from fungi associated with ambrosia beetles were included [48,49,50] (see Table S2 for more details, [48,49,50,51,52,53])…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we used Raffaelea lauricola and Fusarium euwallaceae proteomes in the fungus-like sequence, searching (BLASTp) and Gene Ontology (GO) terms enrichment analysis. These proteomes were obtained through the gene model prediction in previously sequenced genomes ([48,49]; Table S2), which are available through the NCBI database. Ab initio and evidence-direct predictor AUGUSTUS [81,82] was used to generate these first versions of the gene models, which were corrected and improved by MAKER pipeline [83,84], entering the whole genome sequences with masked transposable elements, the available transcriptional dataset [49,85], and a reference protein database containing complete proteomes from some ascomycetes available from the JGI database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%