2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01008-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-patch technique for postinfarction ventricular septal perforation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three sheets consisted of two for the single patch and a third sheet for the additional patch. This additional patch concept is the same as the double‐patch technique reported by Tabuchi in 2004 1 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The three sheets consisted of two for the single patch and a third sheet for the additional patch. This additional patch concept is the same as the double‐patch technique reported by Tabuchi in 2004 1 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the IE than in the non‐IE group. Although this procedure reduced the mortality rate from 61% to 21%, we encountered certain difficulties in determining the optimal patch size and shape for diminishing residual shunting 1,7 . Therefore, we modified the original procedure to a two‐sheet single‐patch technique, in which two separate sheets, sewed to the septum and free wall, are sewn at the center to create a single asymmetrical three‐dimensional endoventricular patch fitting the geometry of the left ventricular cavity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequently, some modifications of the infarction exclusion method have been devised to prevent postoperative residual shunting. [8][9][10] Since 2003, we have also modified the classic David-Komeda infarction exclusion technique exclusion technique using three equine pericardial patches to prevent these postoperative problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%