1990
DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(90)90332-v
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Double-blind comparison of meclofenamate sodium plus codeine, meclofenamate sodium, codeine, and placebo for relief of pain following surgical removal of third molars

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
11
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
9
0
0

Year Published

Range
1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10
1

Relationship

0
11

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)
references

References 6 publications

0
9
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…All included studies were both randomised and double blind. Six studies had a score of 3 using the Oxford Quality Scale (Bentley 1987; Defoort 1983; Honig 1984; Jain 1988; Sunshine 1988,van Steenberghe 1986), 9 a score of 4 (Baird 1980; Bloomfield 1981; Cooper 1982; Desjardins 1984; Giglio 1990; Hersh 1993;Mehlisch 1984; Sunshine 1987; Yonkeura 1987), and 20 a score of 5 (Forbes 1986; Hebertson 1986; Moore 1997 (17 studies);Sunshine 1983). Points were mainly lost due to inadequate description of the methods of randomisation and double blinding.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-three studies (2411 participants) provided data (Baird 1980; Bentley 1987; Bloomfield 1981; Cooper 1982; Defoort 1983; Desjardins 1984; Forbes 1986; Giglio 1990; Hebertson 1986; Hersh 1993; Honig 1984; Jain 1988; Moore 1997 (17 studies); Sunshine 1983; Sunshine 1987; Sunshine 1988; Yonkeura 1987). One study (van Steenberghe 1986) did not provide data for this outcome.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation