2019
DOI: 10.1159/000504238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double Autosomal/Gonosomal Mosaic Trisomy 47,XXX/47,XX,+14 in a Newborn with Multiple Congenital Anomalies

Abstract: Chromosomal trisomies are the most frequent major chromosomal anomalies in humans and can be present in a mosaic or a non-mosaic constitution. We report the first case of a newborn girl presenting with multiple congenital anomalies and a double mosaic trisomy involving chromosome 14 and the X chromosome detected by array CGH. Karyotype analysis revealed a double mosaic with 2 independent abnormal cell lines and the absence of 46,XX and 48,XXX,+14 cell lineages. The patient showed most of the clinical character… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These patients are believed to have specific phenotypes of T14 and TS (Garza-Mayén et al, 2021;Lindgren et al, 2021). According to these reports, mosaic T14 cases may display phenotypes of frontal bossing, ocular hypertelorism, widening of the posterior cranial fossa, micrognathia, abnormal cardiac structure, strephenopodia in early pregnancy, IUGR, hydramnios/ oligohydramnios, cleft palate, high arched jaw, microcephaly, pericardial effusion, cardiac malformation, omphalocele, clenched fist and syndactyly in the late trimester (Massara et al, 2019), some of which are partially consistent with our UPD14 case. However, the final phenotypes are dependent on the percentage of mosaicism ratio and tissue distribution of the mosaic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients are believed to have specific phenotypes of T14 and TS (Garza-Mayén et al, 2021;Lindgren et al, 2021). According to these reports, mosaic T14 cases may display phenotypes of frontal bossing, ocular hypertelorism, widening of the posterior cranial fossa, micrognathia, abnormal cardiac structure, strephenopodia in early pregnancy, IUGR, hydramnios/ oligohydramnios, cleft palate, high arched jaw, microcephaly, pericardial effusion, cardiac malformation, omphalocele, clenched fist and syndactyly in the late trimester (Massara et al, 2019), some of which are partially consistent with our UPD14 case. However, the final phenotypes are dependent on the percentage of mosaicism ratio and tissue distribution of the mosaic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 93 patients selected for array-CGH (array comparative genomic hybridization) analysis, 89 samples were studied with the ISCA v2 8×60K platform and 4 with ISCA 4×180K (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) platform, as previously described [ 30 , 31 ]. For the categorization of the CNVs, the American College of Medical Genetic and Genomics (ACMG) and ClinGen technical standards for interpretation and reporting of constitutional CNVs [ 32 ] were followed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 : These patients were also analyzed by array-CGH (refer to Table 3 for details). 2 : Described in Massara et al, 2019 [ 31 ]; 3 : Confirmed by FISH. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were studied with the ISCA v2 8×60K (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) platform as previously described [16,17]. In some cases, familial samples were analyzed for a full interpretation of the proband's array results.…”
Section: Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (Cma)mentioning
confidence: 99%