2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric comparison between volumetric-modulated arc therapy and a hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy and segmented field-in-field technique for postmastectomy chest wall and regional lymph node irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this, the hybrid plans in the present study showed almost similar results to the PTVs and OARs dosimetric parameters. Table 4 displays the dosimetric parameter appraisal of favoured technique from other published studies 9,[25][26][27] and the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of this, the hybrid plans in the present study showed almost similar results to the PTVs and OARs dosimetric parameters. Table 4 displays the dosimetric parameter appraisal of favoured technique from other published studies 9,[25][26][27] and the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the inclusion of internal mammary node (IMN) irradiates more volumes of heart and ipsilateral lung (IL) by the wide tangent fields of the 3DCRT plan. 9 Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques provide conformal and homogeneous doses to the planning target volumes (PTVs). These techniques reduce the high dose irradiation to NT while delivering increased low dose bath than the 3DCRT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other solutions aiming to mimic the dose distribution of the tangential beam setting did focus on hybrid solutions with various combinations of tangential 3D conformal or IMRT beams with VMAT [ 20 , 21 ]. These approaches outlined the difficulty of breast planning, which might be enhanced for particular anatomies, where the full VMAT solution improves the quality of the resulting doses [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most explored technique reduced the breast en-face entrance, with the so-called "butterfly" or "bow-tie" technique, using short arcs mimicking a more tangential approach [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Other proposals have been hybrid techniques (VMAT and IMRT, or more common VMAT and 3DCRT) [20,21] or noncoplanar settings [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, two opposing tangential fields and a mono-isocentric half-beam-blocked anterior field or two opposing anterior–posterior fields have been employed to treat the chest wall area and supraclavicular nodes, respectively [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] . Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) have been proposed for the treatment of locoregional breast cancer to improve dose homogeneity and conformity, and base-tangential hybrid techniques have been reported to optimize the balance between the target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] . We use a combination of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) plan with a dose gradient of chest wall area and the VMAT plan of supraclavicular area to provide better target coverage and dose homogeneity [17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%