We thank Drs Dai and Huang for their insightful commentary on our report of infliximab rescue therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). 1 Dai and Huang highlight that we rely on an imperfect combination of clinical and patient factors to inform treatment and prognosis in ASUC. We agree that much remains unknown about which therapy, including colectomy, is best. 2 Small sample sizes and variable regimens have hampered our ability to make generalizable conclusions about infliximab effectiveness, let alone other emerging medications. Although our work is one of the largest retrospective analyses on the use of infliximab in ASUC, we remained limited in our ability to make causal inferences because of our sample size. We believe that collaborative, multicenter, prospective research is critical to answer the essential question of which patients will respond to therapy and who will ultimately require colectomy.However, this will not be enough. Dai and Huang point out that the mechanisms for treatment failure in ASUC are often unknown. Certain methods, such as fecal drug wasting leading to lower drug concentrations, can be addressed with new tools such as point-of-care therapeutic drug monitoring. 3 Choosing an immunologic pathway to target via individualized testing is a fascinating prospect to reduce treatment failures but is not yet clinically mature. 4 Finally, moving forward, we must prioritize quality-of-life outcomes equally with colectomy rates to identify those patients who may benefit the most from early surgical intervention.