2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2018.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doppler evaluation of endometrial polyps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Doppler studies provided added value when evaluating all cases in the study combined, reaffirming findings of previous studies 6 . The addition of this simple, noninvasive technique to TVUS, improves detection of endometrial polyps 17 . Use of SIS also has high potential benefit, although this procedure was used in only 10 cases in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Doppler studies provided added value when evaluating all cases in the study combined, reaffirming findings of previous studies 6 . The addition of this simple, noninvasive technique to TVUS, improves detection of endometrial polyps 17 . Use of SIS also has high potential benefit, although this procedure was used in only 10 cases in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…6 The addition of this simple, noninvasive technique to TVUS, improves detection of endometrial polyps. 17 Use of SIS also has high potential benefit, although this procedure was used in only 10 cases in our study. Incorporating this low-cost, safe, and accurate procedure in every-day work, may be beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…the vascular peduncle sign was found in 13/16 cases, accounting for 76.5% and this author found that the polyp size was related to the pedunculated vascular sign, the more common vascular peduncle sign with the larger size of polyp, the average size of polyps in this study was 17.77 mm with P = 0.044. [ 18 ] This assessment differs from that of Medina et al . who found no relationship between polyp size and pedunculated vessel sign.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…(2018), the mean polyp size was 15.29 mm. 34 Cogendez et al. (2015) have reported a mean lesion size of 20.33 ± 10.26 mm and mean polyp size of 15.72 ± 7.39 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%