2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19212-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopants fixation of Ruthenium for boosting acidic oxygen evolution stability and activity

Abstract: Designing highly durable and active electrocatalysts applied in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) electrolyzer for the oxygen evolution reaction remains a grand challenge due to the high dissolution of catalysts in acidic electrolyte. Hindering formation of oxygen vacancies by tuning the electronic structure of catalysts to improve the durability and activity in acidic electrolyte was theoretically effective but rarely reported. Herein we demonstrated rationally tuning electronic structure of RuO2 with introd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
289
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
11
289
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is roughly consistent with the experimental overpotential necessary to reach a current density of 10 mA/cm 2 , a benchmark for the solar-cell community (Suntivich et al, 2011b;Diaz-Morales et al, 2016;Seitz et al, 2016). However, some recent materials have overpotentials below 200 mV to sustain of 10 mA/cm 2 (Kim et al, 2017;Su et al, 2018;Retuerto et al, 2019;Hao et al, 2020), indicating that η TD is not necessarily a quantitatively accurate descriptor of electrocatalytic activity (Exner, 2021a). This discrepancy is most likely because the thermodynamic overpotential and the experimental overpotential have different definitions, and thus have no direct physical correlation: while η TD is a purely thermodynamic indicator of activity based on the free-energy landscape at equilibrium (zero overpotential), the experimental overpotential η must be evaluated at some non-zero current density, and is thus always influenced by the kinetics.…”
Section: Practical Application and Linear Scaling Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This value is roughly consistent with the experimental overpotential necessary to reach a current density of 10 mA/cm 2 , a benchmark for the solar-cell community (Suntivich et al, 2011b;Diaz-Morales et al, 2016;Seitz et al, 2016). However, some recent materials have overpotentials below 200 mV to sustain of 10 mA/cm 2 (Kim et al, 2017;Su et al, 2018;Retuerto et al, 2019;Hao et al, 2020), indicating that η TD is not necessarily a quantitatively accurate descriptor of electrocatalytic activity (Exner, 2021a). This discrepancy is most likely because the thermodynamic overpotential and the experimental overpotential have different definitions, and thus have no direct physical correlation: while η TD is a purely thermodynamic indicator of activity based on the free-energy landscape at equilibrium (zero overpotential), the experimental overpotential η must be evaluated at some non-zero current density, and is thus always influenced by the kinetics.…”
Section: Practical Application and Linear Scaling Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Notably, the authors illustrate that the crystal structure of their synthesized electrode material is kept almost unchanged after the catalysis, except for Ru atoms with an oxidation state smaller than 4 which are oxidized to Ru 4+ . However, over‐oxidation of Ru to oxidation states exceeding 4 is not observed, indicating that increasing the oxygen‐vacancy formation energy is a promising strategy to counteract catalyst degradation under the harsh OER conditions [10] …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent article in Nature Communications, Hao et al apply this strategy to RuO 2 in the OER by co-doping W and Er into the RuO 2 lattice, synthesizing an electrode material with the structural formula W 0.2 Er 0.1 Ru 0.7 O 2-δ by a subsequent hydrothermal and calcination process. [10] Using density functional theory (DFT) calculations, the authors demonstrate that for a W 0.2 Er 0.1 Ru 0.7 O 2-δ (110) model electrocatalyst, the oxygen-vacancy formation energy is significantly enlarged compared to RuO 2 (110), indicating superior stability under OER conditions (cf. Figure 1a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of V O could lead to the exposure of Ru atoms on the surface, which would be over‐oxidized to solvable Ru species with high valency >4. In order to increase the formation barrier of V O in RuO 2 higher than that of the redox H 2 O/O 2 , Zhang group firstly demonstrated W and Er co‐doping into RuO 2 could synergistically tune the Ru 4d and O 2p orbitals basing DOS from DFT 39 . Figure 4(A) suggested the O 2p band center ( ε p ) of W 0.2 Er 0.1 Ru 0.7 O 2−δ located at −4.12 eV while that of RuO 2 was −3.31 eV.…”
Section: Recent Development Of Ru‐based Materials For Oer In Acidic Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(F,G) The chronopotentiometry curves of W 0.2 Er 0.1 Ru 0.7 O 2−δ nanosheets in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 and W 0.2 Er 0.1 Ru 0.7 O 2−δ as anodic side in acidic PEM, respectively. (A–G) Reproduced from Reference 39 with permission from Nature Publishing Group…”
Section: Recent Development Of Ru‐based Materials For Oer In Acidic Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%