1997
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominant-negative abrogation of connexin-mediated cell growth control by mutant connexin genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this study we did not find that inhibition of GJIC by the inhibitor negates the enhanced effect of BBI on cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in H28 cells (data not shown), indicating that BBI-mediated restoration of GJIC does not affect cisiplatin-induced cytotoxicity. Apart from the GJIC-dependent effect of Cx, other data showed that Cx affects cellular homeostatic balance independently of GJIC, and that this GJ-independent effect plays an important role in regulating abnormal growth of cancer cells (5,20). Moreover, we demonstrated that the Cx32 gene acts as a tumor suppressor gene against renal cancer cells in a GJIC-independent mechanism (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, in this study we did not find that inhibition of GJIC by the inhibitor negates the enhanced effect of BBI on cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in H28 cells (data not shown), indicating that BBI-mediated restoration of GJIC does not affect cisiplatin-induced cytotoxicity. Apart from the GJIC-dependent effect of Cx, other data showed that Cx affects cellular homeostatic balance independently of GJIC, and that this GJ-independent effect plays an important role in regulating abnormal growth of cancer cells (5,20). Moreover, we demonstrated that the Cx32 gene acts as a tumor suppressor gene against renal cancer cells in a GJIC-independent mechanism (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Previously we demonstrated that several Cx mutants are strong dominant negative inhibitors of GJIC in dierent cell lines (Du¯ot-Dancer et al, 1997;Krutovskikh et al, 1998Krutovskikh et al, , 2000. Speci®cally, we found that Cx43 lacking seven residues from the internal loop at positions 130 ± 136, eectively abrogated GJIC in BC31 cells (Krutovskikh et al, 1998) by occluding the channels of established gap junctions in the lateral plasma membrane of cells.…”
Section: Inhibition Of Intrinsic Gjic In Bc31 Cells By Dominant-negatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…± by dominant negative mutant of Cx43 As we described previously (Du¯ot-Dancer et al, 1997, Krutovskikh et al, 1998, several mutations of Cx proteins have been characterized as dominant negative because on being coexpressed with wild type Cx these communication-defective Cx mutants are able to interfere with the functional normal Cx protein and deactivate its function. One such Cx43 mutant with a strong dominant negative property has seven residues deleted from its cytoplasmic loop at positions 130 ± 136 (Krutovskikh et al, 1998).…”
Section: Inhibition Of Gjicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is linked to the Cx-mediated GJIC function, in which putative growth inhibitory factors are assumed to di use through the GJ channels and then induce the growth inhibition (Loewenstein, 1979;Mehta et al, 1986;Cornil et al, 1991;Martin et al, 1991;Zhu et al, 1992). The other suggests that the Cx proteins themselves may show some GJIC-independent biological roles in inhibiting the tumor cell growth (Bradshaw et al, 1993;Chen et al, 1995;Du¯ot-Dancer et al, 1997;Statuto et al, 1997;Omori and Yamasaki, 1998;Krutovskikh et al, 2000). However, the precise mechanisms remain unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%