2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.66.034607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominance of collective over proton transfer couplings in the fusion of32Sand34Sw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that the involved nuclei are prolate except for 12 C (β 0 = −0.32 from the multi-dimensionally constrained relativistic mean field model [105][106][107]), 27 Al, and 28 Si. In order to achieve a better agreement with the experiment, the ground state quadrupole deformation parameters of 194,198 Pt are taken from Ref. [108] and for 35 Cl, β 0 = 0.1 is used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the involved nuclei are prolate except for 12 C (β 0 = −0.32 from the multi-dimensionally constrained relativistic mean field model [105][106][107]), 27 Al, and 28 Si. In order to achieve a better agreement with the experiment, the ground state quadrupole deformation parameters of 194,198 Pt are taken from Ref. [108] and for 35 Cl, β 0 = 0.1 is used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reaction was chosen because it not only has a well-known fusion cross section measured previously, but there are also existing, reliable direct measurements of the angular distribution. These measurements, made by Mukherjee et al [1], were made possible by scanning in angle using a velocity filter, as detailed by Wei et al [16]. While more direct, measuring the angular distribution in this way is far more time-consuming, taking a number of days to collect enough counts for satistfactory statistics at all angles.…”
Section: Iterative Procedures To Deduce Angular Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have developed a method to deduce the angular distribution of the evaporation residues from the laboratory-frame velocity distribution σ exp (v l ) of the evaporation residues measured after the solenoid. The method will be discussed, focussing on the example of 34 S+ 89 Y, where the angular distribution has been independently measured using a velocity filter [1]. The establishment of this method now allows the novel solenoidal separator to be used to obtain the most reliable, precision fusion cross-sections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is apparent from The experimental results for the two lead systems are consistent with those reported from fusion measurements for the two reactions 32,36 S + 110 Pd [14], where additional barrier strength at low energies was also found for the lighter projectile 32 S. While the new data support an important role of positive Q-value neutron transfer channels in the fusion of 32 S + 208 Pb, such an interpretation is only unique, if the properties of the collective states in 32 S and 34 S are identical, or at least can be assumed to be very similar. Recent results for the fusion of the sulphur nuclei 32,34 S with 89 Y [15] show that in that case the different collectivity of their quadrupole excitations (Table 2) results in a broader fusion barrier distribution for 32 S than for 34 S. Thus the differences observed in this work between the barrier distributions for 32 S + 208 Pb and 34 S + 208 Pb may not be solely due to coupling to the positive Q-value neutron pick-up channels. Measurements for the heavier system 36 S + 208 Pb may shed additional light on the fusion mechanism.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%