2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2006.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Total Implantability Reduce Infection With the Use of a Left Ventricular Assist Device? The LionHeart Experience in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The LionHeart LVAD was a unique LVAD system that employed a transcutaneous energy conduction system to allow full implantability. While this system eliminated driveline infectious risk, other complications remained or increased [39].…”
Section: Other Vadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LionHeart LVAD was a unique LVAD system that employed a transcutaneous energy conduction system to allow full implantability. While this system eliminated driveline infectious risk, other complications remained or increased [39].…”
Section: Other Vadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the ultimate goals is total implantability of the VAD which would eliminate the need for a driveline and thereby eliminate one of the most important pathways for infection . The clinical utility baseline study (CUBS) trial from 2007 compared the totally implantable LionHeart to the REMATCH data and demonstrated decreased incidence of infection with the totally implantable device suggesting that total implantability may improve infectious outcomes after VAD (Pae et al, 2007) …”
Section: Future Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was also a 9% decrease in device-site infections and a 100% decrease in pump-housing and pump inflow-and outflow-tract infections. 16) As of July 2006, a total of 26 patients had been implanted with the Arrow LionHeart MCSD. Fig.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%