2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2020.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Tinnitus Fill in the Gap Using Electrophysiology? A Scoping Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When tinnitus develops, animals fail GPIAS (a lack of significant suppression between no gap and gap trials within an animal). Although the underlying mechanism of this phenomenon is still under debate (Eggermont, 2013(Eggermont, , 2016Galazyuk and Hébert, 2015;Salloum et al, 2016) the GPIAS test has been verified against psychophysical tests for tinnitus in animals (Turner et al, 2006) and is supported by some data from the human tinnitus population Hébert, 2013, 2020;Duda et al, 2020), although others have debated its use (Campolo et al, 2013;Morse and Vander Werff, 2019). As a lack of significant suppression in the GPIAS test could be due to hearing loss, i.e., the animals not being able to hear the background noise and hence not detecting the gap, or alternatively an issue with startle circuitry, PPI is implemented alongside the GPIAS to exclude these possibilities.…”
Section: Behavioral Tests For Tinnitusmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…When tinnitus develops, animals fail GPIAS (a lack of significant suppression between no gap and gap trials within an animal). Although the underlying mechanism of this phenomenon is still under debate (Eggermont, 2013(Eggermont, , 2016Galazyuk and Hébert, 2015;Salloum et al, 2016) the GPIAS test has been verified against psychophysical tests for tinnitus in animals (Turner et al, 2006) and is supported by some data from the human tinnitus population Hébert, 2013, 2020;Duda et al, 2020), although others have debated its use (Campolo et al, 2013;Morse and Vander Werff, 2019). As a lack of significant suppression in the GPIAS test could be due to hearing loss, i.e., the animals not being able to hear the background noise and hence not detecting the gap, or alternatively an issue with startle circuitry, PPI is implemented alongside the GPIAS to exclude these possibilities.…”
Section: Behavioral Tests For Tinnitusmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, when classifying tinnitus and judging the efficacy of drugs, an objective index is more helpful to the judgment of experimental results [ 4 ]. Moreover, prelingual children and patients with low-functioning behavioral abilities or cognition [ 5 ] need to be tested by the objective method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%