Does heterogeneity in goals and preferences affect efficiency? A case study of farm households in northern Nigeria

Abstract

Household characteristics are commonly used to explain variation in smallholder efficiency levels. The underlying assumption is that differences in intended behavior are well described by such variables, while there is no "a priori" reason that this is the case. Moreover, heterogeneity in farmer goals and preferences, in relation to the role of the farm enterprise, are not well documented in developing countries. This article makes a contribution to fill this gap, by empirically determining heterogeneity in farmer goals and attitudes in Nigeria through a pair-wise ranking, supplemented with Likert scales. Factor analysis is used to reduce these data into behavioral factors. We estimate technical and allocative efficiency levels and analyze how these are related to farm characteristics and the identified behavioral factors. The models in which both intended behavior and farmer characteristics are included give a significantly better fit over models in which only household characteristics are included. These regression results suggest that the socioeconomic environment affects efficiency levels both directly and indirectly, through changes in goals and attitudes. Copyright (c) 2010 International Association of Agricultural Economists.

Farmers' Knowledge and Perception of Agricultural Wetland Management in Rwanda

“…Berkhout et al . () argued that households with smaller land holdings cannot afford strong variations in production as that would threaten food security. According to Adesina (), one of the main factors that influence farmers' use of fertiliser in Côte d'Ivoire is farm size.…”

“…This can be realised, for example through the introduction of varieties that are adapted, high yielding and less prone to diseases and the enhancement of economic incentives, such as well-developed input and output markets, for example for inorganic fertiliser. Berkhout et al (2010) argued that households with smaller land holdings cannot afford strong variations in production as that would threaten food security. According to Adesina (1996), one of the main factors that influence farmers' use of fertiliser in Côte d'Ivoire is farm size.…”

Rationalizing Systems Analysis for the Evaluation of Adaptation Strategies in Complex Human‐Water Systems

“…Expected Utility is the dominant theory to model choice under risk in applied economics (Just & Peterson, ), while Positive Mathematical Programming is the dominant approach to calibrate agricultural programming models (Heckelei et al, ). However, significant empirical evidence shows that the variance in farmers' observed strategic and entrepreneurial behavior often cannot be explained by profit maximization alone (Basarir & Gillespie, ; Berkhout et al, ; Kallas et al, ; Solano et al, ).…”

Assessing Managerial Efficiency on Olive Farms in Greece

“…In em pirical studies, the influ ence of the operational environm ent and of m anagerial ability and effort on the perform ance of agricultural p ro d u ctio n units has typically been cap tu red by regress ing the technical efficiency estim ates (obtained from n on-param etric or p aram etric frontier m odels) on a num ber of variables representing the external en v iro n m ent of farm s and h u m an capital; these include factors such as age, form al education, gender and the num ber of y ears' experience in farm ing (N w achukw u et al, 2011;Berkhout et al, 2010;Balcombe et al, 2008;Solano et al, 2006;T zouvelekas et al, 2002a). The reason for this is th at technical efficiency estim ates (which rank farm s on the basis of their relative perform ance) enable m anagers and policy m akers to identify inefficient units w herein potential im provem ents m ay achieve increases in p rofit or reductions in cost.…”

“…For exam ple, a positive sign of the variable 'fa rm e r's ag e' will im ply th at (on average) older farm ers are better m anagers than younger ones (see, for exam ple, Solano et al, 2006;Berkhout et al, 2010). For exam ple, a positive sign of the variable 'fa rm e r's ag e' will im ply th at (on average) older farm ers are better m anagers than younger ones (see, for exam ple, Solano et al, 2006;Berkhout et al, 2010).…”